Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-11-07 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 06 November 2006 17:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 02:18:41 + Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > | Yes, I'm also sick of this negative level of civility. If I don't > | preempt it now, I'll likely be told that I'm taking the above two > | quotes out of cont

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-11-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 02:18:41 + Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Yes, I'm also sick of this negative level of civility. If I don't | preempt it now, I'll likely be told that I'm taking the above two | quotes out of context Which you are, since you removed a large part of my answer and t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-11-06 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 30 October 2006 17:44, Piotr JaroszyƄski wrote: > E_IUSE=${E_IUSE//"X"} > > But that's a dirty portage-specific hack ;] On Monday 30 October 2006 18:43, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Your solution is approximately on par with fixing a wobbly chair by > sawing off all four legs and then attach

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-11-06 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 07:22:48 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After sleeping on it, I've decided my problem is personal, so i've > just taken my own advice and set up a simple mail filter so I don't > have to listen to this crap anymore. Unless, of course people > respond, which is in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-11-06 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:36:10 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sorry, but is anyone else sick and disgusted with Ciaran talking > to people like this? This isn't called for and shouldn't be > tolerated. No. Perhaps he could have been a bit more subtle, but it was entirely called f