Duncan wrote:
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
>
>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
>>
>>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>>
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce a
Duncan wrote:
> Is anybody subscribed by mail getting stuff on project yet? If neither
> gmane or gentoo's archives are showing anything...
I've received two mails (I believe that's all) after subscribing sometime
wednesday.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Duncan wrote:
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:17:58 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as
RW.
They should
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:15:31PM -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as RW.
>
> I'm sure everyone is busy and this is already in the works, but updating the
> list page [1] would be helpful as well -- along with any other
Ryan Hill wrote:
> These are on gmane now as well. -dev-announce as RO and -project as RW.
I'm sure everyone is busy and this is already in the works, but updating the
list page [1] would be helpful as well -- along with any other documentation
that might be appropriate.
Is there a concise descr
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:20:46PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> :0 Wh: msgid.lock
> | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
> :0 a:
> /dev/null
I'd advise against this bit of procmail hackery.
I used to use it, until I ran into some MUAs that did not generate sane
message-ids (Lotus Notes, certain versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Peterson wrote:
> I suspect
> "not" is the way it was set up, since clearly all posts to the new
> -dev-announce will not be technical, and so they should not be relayed
> to -dev automatically. Anyone know?
>
I like the idea of auto-crosspostin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
>
> According to the bug on -project (which I was CCed to), both it and dev-
> announce have been created.
>
> New developers are announcements. The primary announcement should
> therefore go to dev-announce, x-posted to dev, with fol
Duncan wrote:
> Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
>> To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine
>> which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome
>> development. I shall continue to subscribe to -dev , but not to
>> -project. Should I also subscri
