Il martedì 24 febbraio 2009 00:00:26 Markus Meier ha scritto:
> proposals:
>
> custom-cflags: Build with user-specified CFLAGS (unsupported)
> as custom-cxxflags has been added (w/o discussion here)
I asked it some times ago [1].
I hope we can have custom-c{xx,}flags in global useflags soon
[1]
On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 00:22:39 Josh Sled wrote:
> To that end, please allow me to suggest:
> "Cross-KDE support for file metadata indexing via nepomuk and soprano."
>
> If you don't want to couple the message to those particular packages,
> then maybe just reference the "NEPOMUK project"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Sled wrote:
> Markus Meier writes:
>> semantic-desktop: Semantic desktop allows for storage of digital
>> information and its metadata to allow the user to express his personal
>> mental models, making all in formation become intuitively accessib
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Josh Sled wrote:
> (Also, I note in passing the existing kde-base/pykde4 use.local.desc has
> a tyop of "Nemomuk".)
>
Oh, sweet irony :)
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Markus Meier writes:
> semantic-desktop: Semantic desktop allows for storage of digital
> information and its metadata to allow the user to express his personal
> mental models, making all in formation become intuitively accessible
I find this description pretty content-free and hand-wavy. I usu
Le 03/01/2009 18:57, Ulrich Mueller a écrit :
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Markus Meier wrote:
my proposals:
xft: Build with support for XFT font renderer (x11-libs/libXft)
+1
BTW, why do we have a virtual/xft? Is this a leftover from the times
of monolithic X?
I would say it was there for the
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Markus Meier wrote:
> my proposals:
> xft: Build with support for XFT font renderer (x11-libs/libXft)
+1
BTW, why do we have a virtual/xft? Is this a leftover from the times
of monolithic X?
> And the special case, which probably needs some discussion is the
> gsm fla
Andrey Grozin wrote:
There was a period when qtiplot required qt4 emerged with qt3support USE
flag. So, it had pkg_setup which checked this and produced an error it
necessary.
Ah, that's quite common -- a package FooBar is ported to Qt4, but it
still uses some of the Qt4's Qt3support classes.
Jan Kundr?t wrote:
I don't see a reference to the "qt3support" flag in any of qtiplot
ebuilds, could you please clarify what you mean?
I see, this thing has disappeared in recent versions... Sorry.
There was a period when qtiplot required qt4 emerged with qt3support USE
flag. So, it had pkg_se
Andrey Grozin wrote:
sci-visualization/qtiplot, for example
I don't see a reference to the "qt3support" flag in any of qtiplot
ebuilds, could you please clarify what you mean?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jan Kundr?t wrote:
Markus Meier wrote:
> qt3support: Enable the Qt3Support libraries for Qt4
While it affects a few "packages", they all are parts of the Qt toolkit (which
we
previously shipped in one big package). I can't see a scenario where this flag
might be
used on a package not released b
Markus Meier wrote:
qt3support: Enable the Qt3Support libraries for Qt4
While it affects a few "packages", they all are parts of the Qt toolkit
(which we previously shipped in one big package). I can't see a scenario
where this flag might be used on a package not released by Trolltech.
Chee
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 21:01 +0100, Markus Meier wrote:
> Potential candidates (flag-name, count):
>
> java5 6
Contrary to last comment about this flag going global. We ( the Gentoo
Java Team ) have decided it will be a global use flag, along with java6.
I will be adding de
13 matches
Mail list logo