>>>>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Markus Meier wrote:
> my proposals:
> xft: Build with support for XFT font renderer (x11-libs/libXft)
+1
BTW, why do we have a virtual/xft? Is this a leftover from the times
of monolithic X?
> And the special case, which probably needs some discussion is the
> gsm flag. 7 out of 9 packages use it as a dep of media-sound/gsm,
> the other two depend on sys-apps/pcsc-lite ("Add support for EAP-SIM
> authentication algorithm").
> The question is, whether we should create the global useflag for the
> seven packages and leave the pcsc-lite packages as they are (as we
> "allow" overriding since we have local useflag descriptions in
> metadata.xml), or preferably rename the useflag for the two
> pcsc-lite packages.
If the flags have completely different meanings, then they should have
different names.
Ulrich
