On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:19:17 +0800
"Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Where I can find unofficial gentoo development guide? It isn't
> present where it was week ago. I need it as soon as possible.
see this link:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-344544-highlight
Hi all.
Where I can find unofficial gentoo development guide? It isn't present where
it was week ago. I need it as soon as possible.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 20 May 2005 19:11:13 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| O, so true, so true...
|
| I am trying to redeem myself with the following. Care to give it a
| try?
Pretty close, thanks. I think I'll adapt it a bit to define a cluster in
make.vim and then add to that cluster i
maillog: 20/05/2005-10:29:53(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:01:04 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > | %.1 : %.in
> | > | @regex_cmd@ -e "s,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@,$(VERSION),g" $? >
> $@
> | > |
> | > | The first "@" is span.Specia
maillog: 20/05/2005-18:01:04(+0900): Георги Георгиев
types
> maillog: 20/05/2005-07:22:15(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> > Hrm, that's a vim thing (I'm using a vim script to do the highlighting
> > at compile time, it's not manual). If someone enjoys pain the
On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:01:04 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > | %.1 : %.in
| > | @regex_cmd@ -e "s,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@,$(VERSION),g" $? > $@
| > |
| > | The first "@" is span.Special and the second one is span.Constant.
| >
| > Hrm, that's a vim thing (I'm using a v
maillog: 20/05/2005-07:22:15(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:06:12 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | The phrase "when an option is specified" is a bit ambiguous,
> | especially since it is later referred by the explanation of
> | AC_ARG_WITH. I was not sure
On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:06:12 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| - The configure script is run to produce one or Makefile files
| from Makefile.in files.
| + The configure script is run to produce
| one or more Makefile files from Makefile.in files.
Gah! I'm
maillog: 20/05/2005-06:06:21(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 04:44:25 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | http://www.firedrop.org.uk/devmanual/general-concepts/autotools/
>
> Updated based upon the feedback, thanks guys. If someone who's
> relatively clueless
On Thu, 19 May 2005 04:44:25 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| http://www.firedrop.org.uk/devmanual/general-concepts/autotools/
Updated based upon the feedback, thanks guys. If someone who's
relatively clueless about autotools could give it a read and let me know
what is and isn't
On Thursday 19 May 2005 03:47 pm, Chris White wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:59 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>then if it works, it will add '-lmng' to LDFLAGS ...
> >
> > err, no it doesnt ... it adds -lmng to MNG_LIBS which is updated in
> > Makefile's with AC_SUBST(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:59 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>>then if it works, it will add '-lmng' to LDFLAGS ...
>
>
> err, no it doesnt ... it adds -lmng to MNG_LIBS which is updated in
> Makefile's
> with AC_SUBST() ...
>
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:59 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> then if it works, it will add '-lmng' to LDFLAGS ...
err, no it doesnt ... it adds -lmng to MNG_LIBS which is updated in Makefile's
with AC_SUBST() ...
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 19 May 2005 01:53 pm, Chris White wrote:
> AC_CHECK_LIB(mng, mng_initialize,
> [ AC_CHECK_HEADER(libmng.h,
> [ have_libmng=yes
> MNG_LIBS="-lmng" ],
> AC_MSG_RESULT([*** All libmng dependent parts will be
> disabled ***]))],
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> It came to my attention during a recent discussion on -core that a
> significant number of devs don't have a clue how autotools work and find
> any kind of patching that involves tinkering with configure.ac /
> Makefile.am leve
On Thursday 19 May 2005 01:43 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - i would add notes under AC_ARG_ENABLE /
> AC_ARG_WITH that misuse of these macros is *very* common
just remembered ... an example of how you can detect that your package may be
misusing it ...
if you run ./configure --enable-foo, then f
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 04:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Do you like the picture? Feedback please.
I do like the picture. It's a very pretty picture.
However, some explanation of libtool would be nice, if only because it's
so good at breaking in new and inventive ways.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.o
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:44 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> What more would people like to see explained?
might be useful to have a brief 'syntax' section ... one that covers different
'features' of the m4 language ...
for example, [] are used for quotes and if you try to use "", they are
actua
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:44 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> What more would people like to see explained? Is there anything in there
> that needs changing or clarifying? Anything that's just plain wrong?
> Does it need a section on libtool and if so does someone want to explain
> to me how the heck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> http://www.firedrop.org.uk/devmanual/general-concepts/autotools/
>
> What more would people like to see explained? Is there anything in there
> that needs changing or clarifying? Anything that's just plain wrong?
> Does it nee
It came to my attention during a recent discussion on -core that a
significant number of devs don't have a clue how autotools work and find
any kind of patching that involves tinkering with configure.ac /
Makefile.am level stuff to be very tricky. Clearly, this isn't good,
because a significant num
21 matches
Mail list logo
