10.07.2017 20:22, Agostino Sarubbo пишет:
> Hi all.
>
> every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always
> see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
> Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more
> effort in amd64 and less
On 07/10/2017 10:22 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always
> see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
> Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more
> effort in amd64 an
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:27:54 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>> > This is why stabilisation, if not for individual package maintainers on
>> > amd64, has become a joke, save for Ago's eff
Thanks all for the 'appreciation'.
I'd like to remember that I'm not going away nor I'm retiring, I will just
avoid to touch stabilizations, unless the stable package is part of my
interest.
I'd like also to reminder that in the past I monitored the bugs via the
bugzilla UI, and in the recent
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:22:20 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I
>always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
>Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put
>more effort in amd6
On Monday, July 10, 2017 1:22:20 PM EDT Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I
> always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
> Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more
> effo
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:27:54 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> > This is why stabilisation, if not for individual package maintainers on
> > amd64, has become a joke, save for Ago's efforts, and recent efforts by
> > kensington to streamline the ef
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:17:34 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 10:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Savchenko
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >>
> >>> In the case of amd64 we already
> >>> encourag
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>
> I dunno where you've been lately, Rich, but for most devs, would-be
> devs, and observers .. there -are- no arch teams left .. just a few Arch
> devs, or arch 'people' ..
Obviously.
I was describing how the arch team process worked when t
On 07/10/2017 10:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> In the case of amd64 we already
>>> encourage individual package maintainers to stabilize their own
>>> packages
>>
>> Huh? Hav
On 10/07/17 20:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> For what it's worth, Jack Morgan was recently getting his sparc and
>> ia64 systems back up, but then decided to retire instead when he saw
>> all of the discussions about dropping the architectures he
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> In the case of amd64 we already
>> encourage individual package maintainers to stabilize their own
>> packages
>
> Huh? Have our rules changed? As per devmanual[1] and GLEP 40[2
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> >
> > Now, since I work on these arches just to help, i.e. I don't have any
> > business
> > and I do non have any installation of those arches and the work I'm doing is
> > no
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, Jack Morgan was recently getting his sparc and
> ia64 systems back up, but then decided to retire instead when he saw
> all of the discussions about dropping the architectures he cares
> about.
>
Honestly, I don't really
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always
> see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
> Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more
> effort in
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:22:20PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always
> see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
> Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more
>
Hi Agostino,
at first I want to thank you for the many contributions.
There should be a "thank you" parameter in emerge for every installed
package.
It would be so motivating to see that many user are glad about a special
package. One gets rarely feedback.
I understand your decision and perhaps i
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> Now, since I work on these arches just to help, i.e. I don't have any business
> and I do non have any installation of those arches and the work I'm doing is
> not appreciated at all I decided to stop for now.
I wouldn't say that your w
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:22:20 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc,
> I always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
> Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put
> more effort
Hi all.
every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always
see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status.
Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more
effort in amd64 and less where I saw other people work on it (arm,alpha)
But e
20 matches
Mail list logo
