Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Looks nice in Firefox-1.0.7-r3 with SyncMaster710N (birghtness 35, contrast 65). Suggestions (wrt http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org): 1) The additional links in green at the top look out of place, a bit hard to read, and there lacks any break between the links adding to reading difficulty and, perhaps

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:21:49 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > People might also be interested in looking at Aaron's own page > for the design. It seems to be a bit clearer: > > http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/ > One thing i notice is that the three bottom menus are only shown on

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Hi, I'm not sure if you noticed this or are even worried about it yet. If you go here: http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/main/en/morenews.xml then try to click on the link for Status Update , the link is broken. I hope my copy an

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Is it possible to have the font from the original Aaron Shi design? George -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 04:38:46PM +0300, Alexey Chumakov wrote: > 3. It is, imho, great moment to implement some i18n together with site > redesign. Many of us, i18n teams, have to 'clone' and maintain extensive > community sites just to bypass artificial English-only w.g.o front page > limitation

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 08:18, Curtis Napier wrote: > This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. > > http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org > > After receiving a ton of very useful feedback from the developer > community I have updated the redesign. It should now be closer to 100% > acces

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Carsten Lohrke wrote: >I have to say I'm somewhat disappointed by what I see compared to Aarons >proposed look¹. > > > > Agreed! >a) Regarding the space below the two horizontal menus: A continuous image >looks much better than these "cells" with a lot of useless and redundant >links above

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

What?? fix for IE?? haha... Why not do the Gentoo's site with XUL? I think that doing for Safari/Konqueror, Mozilla and IE/Win is suficient, no?2005/11/22, Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Monday 21 November 2005 12:50, Harald van Dijk wrote:> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:18:21AM -0500, Curtis N

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 14:38, Alexey Chumakov wrote: > > Hi Curtis, > > First of all, thank you for the impressive new design. I really like > it! > > Technically (@Windows XP SP2 RUS, 1024x768): > Firefox 1.0.7 Rus -- OK > Opera 8.5 Rus -- OK > MSIE 6 Rus -- OK > > Some issues to discuss: > 1.

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 13:07, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:18:21 -0500 > > Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm asking for everyone (developers and users alike) to please > > have a look at the updated site and send any feedback you may > > have. > > F

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 12:50, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:18:21AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser > > version in your feedback. I haven

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 13:36, Jakub Moc wrote: > Well, I would like to see them on the left (and really could live without > those illustrative pics accompanying them, but that's just me. ;) I don't think they're very useful at the bottom either, but one (imho) important improvement of the de

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

I have to say I'm somewhat disappointed by what I see compared to Aarons proposed look¹. a) Regarding the space below the two horizontal menus: A continuous image looks much better than these "cells" with a lot of useless and redundant links above them. If you think the space is wasted - well

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curtis Napier wrote: > This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. > > http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org > > After receiving a ton of very useful feedback from the developer > community I have updated the redesign. It should now be closer to 100% > accessible and it should (hopefully)

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curtis Napier wrote: > I'm especially interested in feedback from anyone who uses > accessibilty programs such as screen readers or if you are color > blind or have any other accessibilty issues. Not being blind or otherwise visually handicapped, but I use rather large letters (18 pixels), do not

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curtis Napier wrote: This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. make the purple bar with portage and the other feature disappear or at least 1/2 tall. Put the Community, Resource, Documentation either on the left in a pane or on the top. the sponsor pane should retain the

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 21.11.2005, 20:16:47, Renat Golubchyk wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:37:00 -0600 Lance Albertson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Variable names and commands are bright blue in the old docs. The new > color is darker and that does not improve readabi

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Curtis Napier wrote: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version > in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari > so feedback from those browsers woul

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:37:00 -0600 Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Curtis Napier wrote: > > > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser > > version in your feedback. I haven't received feedb

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, 2005-21-11 at 02:18 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > I'm asking for everyone (developers and users alike) to please have a > look at the updated site and send any feedback you may have. I'm > especially interested in feedback from anyone who uses accessibilty > programs such as screen reade

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 of November 2005 16:08 Lares Moreau wrote: > I don't know if the contents are supposed to be the 'live' website data, > but, after scrolling down to the nice link tables at the bottom, > clicking on GLEPs, the info is outdated. Only up to GLEP 38. > > Don't know if that is what you are

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

I don't know if the contents are supposed to be the 'live' website data, but, after scrolling down to the nice link tables at the bottom, clicking on GLEPs, the info is outdated. Only up to GLEP 38. Don't know if that is what you are looking for? Later Days -- Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Aaron Kulbe wrote: >>I have the same consern. I use a TFT-display (Dell 2005FPW) that has a >>quite bright back light which might be the cause of the light colors >>being hard to read. > > > Petteri, > > I have that same display. I turn the brightness down to 40%, since > it's way too bright at

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 07:49 -0500, Philip Webb wrote: > 051121 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > > I would rather see something about system customization in general, > > not only CFLAGS but also USE flag et al, which is much more interresting. > > Something like "Get Gentoo and make your own «

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

> I have the same consern. I use a TFT-display (Dell 2005FPW) that has a > quite bright back light which might be the cause of the light colors > being hard to read. Petteri, I have that same display. I turn the brightness down to 40%, since it's way too bright at the default 100%. Cheers, Aar

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Lance Albertson wrote: > Curtis Napier wrote: > > >>If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or >>Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version >>in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari >>so feedback from those brow

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 14:24, Gim wrote: > Seems like the amount of wasted space grows when fonts size is _reduced_. > I'm no sure why/how such a thing is possible, but for sure it's something > that has to be fixed in order to obtain suitable layouts for a wider set > of firefox settings. I th

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Lance Albertson wrote: Curtis Napier wrote: If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari so feedback from those browsers wou

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curtis Napier пишет: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser > version in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror > or Safari so feedback from those browsers would be much appreciated

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

> Firefox-1.0.7 here, on a 1024x768 screen, and i think there is too > much wasted space. Since i'm not new to Gentoo, when i go to the > front page it's either to follow link to the doc or to read news. > The former is fine, but the later is not (news are the last ~10% of > what i see): > http://t

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

051121 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > I would rather see something about system customization in general, > not only CFLAGS but also USE flag et al, which is much more interresting. > Something like "Get Gentoo and make your own « sur mesure » system", > but i don't know how to translate "sur

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

21.11.2005, 13:23:29, Herbert G. Fischer wrote: > Good job! > - The bottom menus are very nice but I think they are in the wrong place. > The natural human being will search for all the site menu items on the top or > "first" page (without scrolling). The rule in this case is to put all menu >

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Good job! Shows nice on Firefox 1.0.7, Opera 8.5 and Konqueror 3.4.1! I don't know if you are accepting suggestions, but I have a few "usability" ones: - The top blue bar(s) is too much big. In a 1024x768 screen it takes almost half the showing page. Maybe decreasing the size of the "second" bar

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:18:21 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm asking for everyone (developers and users alike) to please > have a look at the updated site and send any feedback you may > have. Firefox-1.0.7 here, on a 1024x768 screen, and i think there is too much wasted spac

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:18:21AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version > in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari > so feedback f

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curtis Napier wrote: > This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. > > http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org > > After receiving a ton of very useful feedback from the developer > community I have updated the redesign. It should now be closer to 100% > accessible and it should (hopefully) r

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Monday 21 November 2005 08:18, Curtis Napier wrote: > This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version > in your feedback. I haven't received

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:18:21AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version > in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari > so feedback f

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curtis Napier wrote: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version > in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari > so feedback from those browsers would be much appreciated

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

Curt, I'm on a Mac Mini. OS X 10.4, Safari v. 2.0.2 Looks good here. Cheers, Aaron Kulbe a.k.a. SuperLag On 11/21/05, Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. > > http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org > > After receiving a ton of very usef

[gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org

This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign. http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org After receiving a ton of very useful feedback from the developer community I have updated the redesign. It should now be closer to 100% accessible and it should (hopefully) render perfectly in all browsers