On 13/07/2011 19:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 13:36:29 Ed W wrote:
>> On 12/07/2011 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> baselayout-1 vs openrc isnt the issue. it's bash array support vs
>>> flat strings. the former is supported in baselayout-1, and should be
>>> supported
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 13:36:29 Ed W wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > baselayout-1 vs openrc isnt the issue. it's bash array support vs
> > flat strings. the former is supported in baselayout-1, and should be
> > supported in openrc. William is talking about dropping
On 12/07/2011 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> baselayout-1 vs openrc isnt the issue. it's bash array support vs
> flat strings. the former is supported in baselayout-1, and should be
> supported in openrc. William is talking about dropping support from
> openrc and i've laid out the way to get fr
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> it would be nice to come up with some level of automated conversion. no
>> matter how much we say "read the docs", there will always be people who do
>> not. i think the reason the openr
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:12:45AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> > it would be nice to come up with some level of automated conversion. no
> > matter how much we say "read the docs", there will always be people who do
> > not. i think t
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> it would be nice to come up with some level of automated conversion. no
> matter how much we say "read the docs", there will always be people who do
> not. i think the reason the openrc upgrade has gone so smooth thus far is
> because ho
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 00:54:02 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:27:59PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i dont think we've had openrc in stable long enough to force people to
> > migrate. so i'd keep the code putting along for now, and add a note to
> > the feature removal sc
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:27:59PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont think we've had openrc in stable long enough to force people to
> migrate. so i'd keep the code putting along for now, and add a note to the
> feature removal schedule only after we have checks in the openrc ebuil
On Monday, July 11, 2011 20:38:49 William Hubbs wrote:
> this bug was filed against OpenRc today [1]. The issue was that the user
> was attempting to use bash arrays, which, as far as I knew are not
> supported in OpenRc.
they've been supported to ease migration from existing configs.
> bash arra
Hi all,
this bug was filed against OpenRc today [1]. The issue was that the user
was attempting to use bash arrays, which, as far as I knew are not
supported in OpenRc. The migration guide and net.example both do not use
them, so if the user followed all of the migration steps, they wouldn't be
us
10 matches
Mail list logo
