Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2009-12-07 Thread Thilo Bangert
Hans de Graaff said: > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check. > > > > dev-util/cucumbermissing > > Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies > upstream)* )> > > That should p

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2009-12-07 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check. > dev-util/cucumbermissing Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies That should probably be: Kind regards, Hans signature.asc Des

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2009-12-07 Thread Thilo Bangert
Ulrich Mueller said: > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > > > Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check. > > [...] > > > > You will find the complete log at [1]. > > Hmm, eselect is not known: > | unknown maintainer: esel...@gentoo.org > > But it's in good company: > |

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2009-12-07 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Thilo Bangert wrote: > Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check. > [...] > You will find the complete log at [1]. Hmm, eselect is not known: | unknown maintainer: esel...@gentoo.org But it's in good company: | unknown maintainer: catal...@gentoo.org | unkn

[gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2009-12-07 Thread Thilo Bangert
Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check. Todays fingerpointing herd without email: secure-tunneling herd without email: middle-east app-admin/eselect-audicleempty app-admin/eselect-chuck empty app-admin/eselect-miniaudicleempty app-admin/e

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-13 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:30:14AM +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > 2. Check that metadata with a proxy maint also has a non-retired Gentoo > > person listed. > 'Proxy maintainer without gentoo association' means 'there is neither a > herd nor a gentoo maintainer listed'. you want to require a main

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-13 Thread Thilo Bangert
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > Noteworthy errors > > === > > herd without email: comm-fax > > Proxy maintainer without gentoo association 15 > > Two specific feature requests: > 1. Che

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:21:19PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > On 2/12/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > > Noteworthy errors > > > === > > > herd without email: comm-fax > > > Proxy main

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-12 Thread Alec Warner
On 2/12/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > Noteworthy errors > > === > > herd without email: comm-fax > > Proxy maintainer without gentoo association 15 > Two specific feature requests:

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > Noteworthy errors > === > herd without email: comm-fax > Proxy maintainer without gentoo association 15 Two specific feature requests: 1. Check that every email address has a bugzilla account. 2. Check

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 12 février 2008 à 22:01 +0100, Thilo Bangert a écrit : > Welcome to the third edition of the irregular metadata.xml check. [snip] > net-wireless/gnome-bluetoothretired maintainer removed liquidx and added gnome to the list of herds. [snip] -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PR

[gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check - 3rd edition

2008-02-12 Thread Thilo Bangert
Welcome to the third edition of the irregular metadata.xml check. Noteworthy errors === herd without email: comm-fax herd without email: dev-tools herd without email: haskell herd without email: common-lisp herd without email: secure-tunneling herd without email: ia64-

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-11 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:41:30AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > Herds with no email > === > > As robbat2 points out, in order to allow for automatic bug assignment all > herds need to have an email address. The following herds do not have an > email address specified in herds.xm

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-11 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:26:27AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote: > Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti: > > Thilo Bangert wrote: > >> is a herd1300 > > These seem intentional. Is there anything wrong with it? > Yes. You use the element to mark herds. I do see a valid usage cas

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-11 Thread Petteri Räty
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti: > Thilo Bangert wrote: >> is a herd1300 > > These seem intentional. Is there anything wrong with it? > > Marijn Yes. You use the element to mark herds. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-11 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thilo Bangert wrote: > is a herd1300 These seem intentional. Is there anything wrong with it? Marijn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.o

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-10 Thread Rémi Cardona
Thilo Bangert wrote: [great stuff here] Thanks for your useful work Thilo :) /me tips hat Rémi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-06-10 Thread Thilo Bangert
Hi all, welcome to the second issue of the irregular metadata.xml check. Did you know that only 16% of all packages in the tree do not belong to any herd (ie. no-herd). Nevertheless, as no-herd is not a nice place to be, perhaps your herd can adopt a package or two. If you get really lucky you

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-27 Thread Radoslaw Stachowiak
On 27/05/07, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...and many others...] What I deeply miss from gentoo-dev mailing list is lack of summary at end of discussions. Current situation is that at the end of such disputes very often (of course not always :) is still unclear if: * decision has be

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-27 Thread Thilo Bangert
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional > > . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are > > raised, all herd tags will be removed and replaced by > > t

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional > . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are raised, > all herd tags will be removed and replaced by the > appropriate tag instead. Work on this will start

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-23 Thread Timothy Redaelli
Alle mercoledì 23 maggio 2007, Chris Gianelloni ha scritto: > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:49 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional > > . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are raised, > > all herd tags will be removed and replaced

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:49 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional > . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are raised, > all herd tags will be removed and replaced by the > appropriate tag instead. Work on this will start over t

[gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2007-05-23 Thread Thilo Bangert
Hi all, welcome to the IMC - irregular metdata.xml check, issue 1. As can be seen from the statistcis below, the herd tags have been fixed. Thanks to those who have helped with the cleanup. Whats next? == The current policy in the devmanual demands a maintainer tag - nevertheless half t