On Tuesday 19 April 2005 00:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 18 April 2005 05:04 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > On Monday 18 April 2005 22:50, John Huttley wrote:
> > > I have been compiling everything recently with pic and pie.
> > > I thought this would be a prerequisite for effect
On Monday 18 April 2005 05:04 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 18 April 2005 22:50, John Huttley wrote:
> > I have been compiling everything recently with pic and pie.
> > I thought this would be a prerequisite for effective use of "prelink".
>
> It's a prerequisite for prelinking s
On Monday 18 April 2005 22:50, John Huttley wrote:
> I have been compiling everything recently with pic and pie.
> I thought this would be a prerequisite for effective use of "prelink".
It's a prerequisite for prelinking shared libraries, afaik. It's not needed
for executables, so this shouldn't b
Would someone please expand on this?
perhaps a link if its documented elseware?
I have been compiling everything recently with pic and pie.
I thought this would be a prerequisite for effective use of "prelink".
A minor hit in program speed would not concern me.
Regards,
John
--
John Huttl
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know
> exactly what it's for and you're sure you need it
I figured this use flag should be used to ensure libraries are built as PIC
(i.e. conform to the relevant ABI). This is a common problem on the media
On Friday 15 April 2005 10:35 am, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2005 23:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 15 April 2005 10:13 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > > On Friday 15 April 2005 16:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > media-video/avidemux
> > >
> > > This is already rem
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Friday 15 April 2005 10:29 am, Francesco Riosa wrote:
>
>
>>Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know
>>>exactly
>>>
>>>
>>[... snip of how much PIC is bad ]
>>
>>
>
>PIC isnt bad ... people misusin
On Friday 15 April 2005 10:29 am, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know
> > exactly
>
> [... snip of how much PIC is bad ]
PIC isnt bad ... people misusing USE=pic is bad
> A clarification: It's ok to use it _only_ f
On Friday 15 April 2005 23:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2005 10:13 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > On Friday 15 April 2005 16:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > media-video/avidemux
> >
> > This is already removed by patch on bug #89097.. I anyway think that this
> > is my f
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:07:53AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know exactly
> what it's for and you're sure you need it ... a quick `grep -Rl ^IUSE=.*pic`
> of the tree shows a bunch of ebuilds which appear to be misusing it:
> ap
Hi,
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> A clarification: It's ok to use it _only_ for _libraryes_ by default ?
> i.e
> econf [...] --with-lib-ccflags="-fPIC"
>
> Using it now and interested to know if it's plain wrong
Shared objects should be built with -fPIC anyway, since a few arches
require it and it ma
On Friday 15 April 2005 16:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> you have an execuse ... you havent taken the dev quiz yet which has a PIC
> usage question ;)
Well actually now I taken it :) but the patches where previous to that :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/
pgpS
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know exactly
>
[... snip of how much PIC is bad ]
A clarification: It's ok to use it _only_ for _libraryes_ by default ?
i.e
econf [...] --with-lib-ccflags="-fPIC"
Using it now and interested to know if it's
On Friday 15 April 2005 10:13 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2005 16:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > media-video/avidemux
>
> This is already removed by patch on bug #89097.. I anyway think that this
> is my fault (as for djvu and tvtime, probably).
> Sorry about that.
you
On Friday 15 April 2005 16:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> media-video/avidemux
This is already removed by patch on bug #89097.. I anyway think that this is
my fault (as for djvu and tvtime, probably).
Sorry about that.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/
pgpT1KCPj9
as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know exactly
what it's for and you're sure you need it ... a quick `grep -Rl ^IUSE=.*pic`
of the tree shows a bunch of ebuilds which appear to be misusing it:
app-admin/amanda
app-text/djvu
media-libs/guilib
media-libs/libvisual
medi
16 matches
Mail list logo
