On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Now, imho, we have 2 choice:
>
> 1)Support them with an iso or at least a manual if we can't do an handbook
> 2)Lose the stable keyword and don't waste manpower anymore.
>
> What do you think about?
I haven't seen many problems, except on
On 02/17/13 17:03, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I have no
> interest) because they appears understaffed.
>
> Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since the dev-
> machine[1] is a bit slow; well, I discovered w
On 17 February 2013 22:46, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 02/17/2013 11:03 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>>
>> In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I have
>> no
>> interest) because they appears understaffed.
>>
>> Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, fo
On 02/17/2013 11:03 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I have no
interest) because they appears understaffed.
Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since the dev-
machine[1] is a bit slow; well, I discovered we ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 09:30 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2013 13:14:28 Alec Warner wrote:
>> It is not clear to me why you would email the -dev list about
>> these arches, vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc.
>
> I don't gu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 08:40 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2013 20:22:00 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> I am not sure what are you trying to prove here.
>
> I point out that there is not iso, no manual, no manpower.
No manual does not mean
On Sunday 17 February 2013 13:14:28 Alec Warner wrote:
> It is not
> clear to me why you would email the -dev list about these arches,
> vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc.
I don't guess is a good idea have a private conversation and then drop an
arch...
--
Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered
>> 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in
>> my opinion, the ideal approach w
On Sunday 17 February 2013 20:22:00 Markos Chandras wrote:
> I am not sure what are you trying to prove here.
I point out that there is not iso, no manual, no manpower.
> No project page does not mean the arch is minor or dead or whatever.
For me this means that there is no enough support.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 07:43 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> First you need to tell us what arches you think they are
>> considered 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document
>> that. The
On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
> First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered
> 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in
> my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable
> keywords for them.
http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 04:03 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I
> have no interest) because they appears understaffed.
>
> Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since
> th
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Joking aside, I can imagine architectures where it's preferable to set up a
> stage directly from a running maintenance system (maybs s390???). Also, none
> of my arm gadgets comes with a CD drive, so I had to e.g. prepare the stage on
Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2013, 17:03:43 schrieb Agostino Sarubbo:
> In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I have no
> interest) because they appears understaffed.
>
> Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since the dev-
> machine[1] is a bit slow;
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Now, imho, we have 2 choice:
>
> 1)Support them with an iso or at least a manual if we can't do an handbook
> 2)Lose the stable keyword and don't waste manpower anymore.
We also have another choice if there is so little interest
In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I have no
interest) because they appears understaffed.
Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since the dev-
machine[1] is a bit slow; well, I discovered we have no ISO[2] available and
there is no handbook[
16 matches
Mail list logo
