On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Agostino Sarubbo <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote: >> First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered >> 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in >> my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable >> keywords for them. > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/index.xml#doc_chap4 > I don't see project page for: m68k, sh, s390 > > > 20:41 <ago> expn m68k > 20:41 <willikins> m68k = vapier, > 20:41 <ago> expn sh > 20:42 <willikins> sh = vapier,matsuu,armin76,ago, > 20:42 <ago> expn s390 > 20:42 <willikins> s390 = vapier,armin76,ago,
Afaik sh and s390 were both vapier-driven projects. I'd recommend chatting with him as to whether they are worth salvaging. It is not clear to me why you would email the -dev list about these arches, vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc. -A > -- > Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org > Gentoo Linux Developer >
