Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 17:43 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > > > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAI

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:02 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be > > included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel > > in portage. The grub maintainer has b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-02 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I still think it's retarded to have a re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-02 Thread Dan Meltzer
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but > > >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-02 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but > >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P > > > > It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everyth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-02 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be >>included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel >>in portage. The grub maintai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-02 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be > included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel > in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or > so however, so i guess it's now

[gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4

2005-10-01 Thread R Hill
Chris Bainbridge wrote: Hi, I was wondering if there's any chance of having the reiser4 patch for grub (or even the whole grub-reiser4 distfile) added to the ebuild. There are various bugs where people have posted patches for 0.96x ebuilds which were never added and the bugs have been WONTFIXed