On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Dale wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> >
> > sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage
> > integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead
> > of stable for that portion.
> >
> > --
> > Doug Goldstein
>
> I think
Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
> sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage
> integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead
> of stable for that portion.
>
> --
> Doug Goldstein
I think this is something dispatch-conf does too. I use that but still
ma
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
> > packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
> > openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. Ther
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
>
>> Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
>> is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
>> handbook as a result.
> For regular users, who won't be up to deve
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
> is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
> handbook as a result.
For regular users, who won't be up to developer standards, maybe the
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
> packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
> openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. There are details in
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/08/13 10:57 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Rich Freeman [130816 10:43]:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few
>>> people lost their net configs
>>>
>>> So
* Rich Freeman [130816 10:43]:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
> > lost their net configs
> >
> > So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
>
> And hence the value of having a group of volunt
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
> lost their net configs
>
> So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs
(anybody running ~arch) is dem
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart wrote:
>> Re , William Hubbs said:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This message is an announcement and a reminder.
>>>
>>> OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
>>> days.
>>>
>>> If you are
On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart wrote:
> Re , William Hubbs said:
>> All,
>>
>> This message is an announcement and a reminder.
>>
>> OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
>> days.
>>
>> If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies:
>> remember th
11 matches
Mail list logo
