Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Buchholz: > Hello, > > the Security Team would like to create a new DTD for our GLSAs. GLSAs > are distributed via our web site and the tree. Their format is defined > by a DTD. > > When the format was initially defined in 2004, some use c

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs

2009-05-26 Thread Pierre-Yves Rofes
On Tue, May 26, 2009 4:49 pm, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Buchholz: [...] >> (+) SLOT support. An implied attribute 'slot' to the 'vulnerable' >> and 'unaffected' tag will be introduced. This limits the scope of >> the range specifiers to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs

2009-05-26 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Buchholz: > > I would like to announce the changes we want to introduce. If you > > have any feedback, please speak up. This can include feature > > requests. > > Maybe add a 'tag' attribute to t

[gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs

2009-05-26 Thread Robert Buchholz
Hello, the Security Team would like to create a new DTD for our GLSAs. GLSAs are distributed via our web site and the tree. Their format is defined by a DTD. When the format was initially defined in 2004, some use cases were considered that never got implemented or used. Other use cases only