On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:37:10 -0500
Gordon Pettey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM Joonas Niilola
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Another big issue is as mjo pointed out, not everyone uses GH.
> >
>
> "Not using GitHub" is not an excuse for a PR to sit ignored when it
> has a bug attachment. Anyo
[2023-08-11 22:12:27-0400] Mike Gilbert:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 21:18 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 10:35 -0700, orbea wrote:
>
> Perhaps the correct answer would be neither Bugzilla or Github?
A mailing list (whose archives work :o) with git-send-email threads
would be an im
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 21:18 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 10:35 -0700, orbea wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the correct answer would be neither Bugzilla or Github?
>
> A mailing list (whose archives work :o) with git-send-email threads
> would be an improvement over both.
I'm su
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 21:18 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 10:35 -0700, orbea wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the correct answer would be neither Bugzilla or Github?
>
> A mailing list (whose archives work :o) with git-send-email threads
> would be an improvement over both.
>
>
> I don’
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 18:37 -0500, Gordon Pettey wrote:
>
> "Not using GitHub" is not an excuse for a PR to sit ignored when it has a
> bug attachment. Anyone can view a PR anonymously and clone the remote from
> the read-only https URL. There's no "using github" required for that beyond
> clickin
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 10:35 -0700, orbea wrote:
>
> Perhaps the correct answer would be neither Bugzilla or Github?
A mailing list (whose archives work :o) with git-send-email threads
would be an improvement over both.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM Joonas Niilola wrote:
>
> Another big issue is as mjo pointed out, not everyone uses GH.
>
"Not using GitHub" is not an excuse for a PR to sit ignored when it has a
bug attachment. Anyone can view a PR anonymously and clone the remote from
the read-only https URL
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:54 PM Sam James wrote:
> juippis' whole email nails the issue, but I'd just like to add that
> there's kind of a baseline at ~400/~450 or so where everything below
> that is PRs for new packages or long-obsolete stuff nobody closed yet,
> or where we're waiting on the su
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:10:36 +0300
Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 11.8.2023 17.07, orbea wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
> > includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since
> > 2021.
>
> That's a bit misleading. The PR in q
Joonas Niilola writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 11.8.2023 17.07, orbea wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
>> includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since 2021.
>
> That's a bit misleading. The PR in question is
On 11.8.2023 17.07, orbea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
> includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since 2021.
That's a bit misleading. The PR in question is opened by a Gentoo
developer, and labeled as "do-not-merge". So mayb
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 07:46 -0700, orbea wrote:
>
> Understandable, but I still don't get how 1 or 2 people can take care
> of SBo every week while Gentoo the process stagnates.
Probably due to compartmentalization. In Gentoo you're often waiting
for one maintainer. Or worse, waiting for one "pro
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:19:29 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 07:07 -0700, orbea wrote:
> >
> > Why does Gentoo lets PRs indefinitely sit around and collect dust?
> > Its extremely discouraging for contributors if their work just gets
> > ignored. With some extra work I imag
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 07:07 -0700, orbea wrote:
>
> Why does Gentoo lets PRs indefinitely sit around and collect dust? Its
> extremely discouraging for contributors if their work just gets ignored.
> With some extra work I imagine its possible to get the PR queue to a
> much more manageable size w
Hi,
Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since 2021.
While not trying to be rude before contributing to Gentoo I was involved
with Slackbuilds.org for Slackware where everything gets reviewed once
a week with
15 matches
Mail list logo
