On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Patrick Kursawe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Pawe? Madej wrote:
I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
Linux in coordinance with standards provided by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Nope. There's no interest in LSB compliance. LSB isn't a real standard,
| it's some nonsense dreamed up so that companies like Sun can claim that
| they are "Linux compliant" (meaning "behaves like RedHat").
Of course you'll
On Friday 23 September 2005 12:22 pm, Paweł Madej wrote:
> I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
> question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
> Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this specification?
this has come up before o
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:22:43 +0200 Paweł Madej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
| question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing
| Gentoo Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this
| specification?
Nope.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Pawe? Madej wrote:
> I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
> question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
> Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this specification?
>
> Could someone g
Hello,
I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this specification?
Could someone give me reasons why yes or no?
Greets
Pawel
--
gentoo-dev@gen
