-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | Nope. There's no interest in LSB compliance. LSB isn't a real standard, | it's some nonsense dreamed up so that companies like Sun can claim that | they are "Linux compliant" (meaning "behaves like RedHat").
Of course you'll want to read Ulrich Drepper's rant [1] (Red Hat guy) on why the LSB sucks. I found it from the LWN announcement of LSB 3.0. Thanks, Donnie 1. http://www.livejournal.com/users/udrepper/8511.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDND3YXVaO67S1rtsRAqs0AJ9KZbvh/R4dXB8bZE+VTNWzO2RqewCeInya VyTiDTqQUTf8lT/AlavEw40= =gt64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
