I think that a superproject can serve as a good rubber-band grouping
construct, personlaly
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El jue, 11-08-2016 a las 13:15 +0300, Mart Raudsepp escribió:
> > [...]
> > It should be kept for the purposes of coordination between different
> > s
El jue, 11-08-2016 a las 13:15 +0300, Mart Raudsepp escribió:
> [...]
> It should be kept for the purposes of coordination between different
> specific desktop projects and the grouping of them it provides as
> subprojects.
> However that doesn't mean it should have any packages in the tree
> that
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 09.08.2016 kell 12:02, kirjutas Jason Zaman:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> > > [...]
> > > Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that
> > > contains
> > > al
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> > [...]
> > Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that
> > contains
> > all the subprojects, no?
> >
>
> But I don't know if the projects will like to b
On 08/07/2016 10:37 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
>> [...]
>> Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that
>> contains
>> all the subprojects, no?
>>
>
> But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way...
>
El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> [...]
> Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that
> contains
> all the subprojects, no?
>
But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way...
because freedesktop-bugs was behaving exactly in that wa
On 08/07/2016 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
>> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>>
>>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
>>>
>>> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but
>>> I
>>> am uns
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0700, Raymond Jennings escribió:
> If an empty project has subprojects, I think that violates the
> definition of empty.
>
Empty in the terms of previously having a maintainer taking care of it
and now being "maintainer-needed"... I didn't think I would need to
exp
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
> >
> > Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but
> > I
> > am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now
If an empty project has subprojects, I think that violates the definition
of empty.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:46 AM, james wrote:
> On 08/06/2016 09:29 AM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>
>> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>
>>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
>>>
>>> Well, it se
On 08/06/2016 09:29 AM, NP-Hardass wrote:
On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but I
am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now empty
I think it makes sense to keep
On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
>
> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but I
> am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now empty
>
>
>
I think it makes sense to keep desktop environments in a logic
Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but I
am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now empty
13 matches
Mail list logo
