If an empty project has subprojects, I think that violates the definition of empty.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:46 AM, james <gar...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 08/06/2016 09:29 AM, NP-Hardass wrote: > >> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> >>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop >>> >>> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but I >>> am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now empty >>> >>> >>> >>> >> I think it makes sense to keep desktop environments in a logical >> grouping. There isn't a need for an overarching control structure right >> now, but if there needs to be coordination of efforts, I think keeping >> it in its current structure allows that to happen more easily than if we >> didn't have all the DEs in a project together. >> >> > +1 > James > >
