Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes:
>
> yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
> get
> new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
>
> so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice
> any
> regressions ? the 'best' tests are simp
Am 2005-05-31 18:57 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> small patch so that if RC_VOLUME_ORDER is unset, it'll default to "raid evms
> lvm dm" ... i'll drop it with 1.11.13 or 1.11.14
Yes and may be add a boot warning meanwhile that the RC_VOLUME_ORDER is
completely unset. I for example would have s
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 06:49 pm, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> Am 2005-05-31 09:18 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > did you properly `etc-update` then ?
>
> Ooops!
someone (i think johnm) mentioned this to me before ... i'm going to add a
small patch so that if RC_VOLUME_ORDER is unset, it'll de
Am 2005-05-31 09:18 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> did you properly `etc-update` then ?
Ooops!
> your /etc/conf.d/rc must have RC_VOLUME_ORDER set to at least 'lvm'
ARGH!! I apologize! I always watch the diff output while etc-updating
exactly, even on baselayout or something else importand stu
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 08:45 am, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> Am 2005-05-31 08:20 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > > baselayout at bugs.gentoo.org #94120.
> >
> > are you using lvm2 as your root filesystem ?
>
> No I only have /home, /usr and subdirs under /usr as lvm2 volumes, not
> root. Sorry,
Am 2005-05-31 08:20 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > baselayout at bugs.gentoo.org #94120.
>
> are you using lvm2 as your root filesystem ?
No I only have /home, /usr and subdirs under /usr as lvm2 volumes, not
root. Sorry, yes, I forgot to mention...
Konsti
--
GPG KeyID EF62FCEF
Fingerprint
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 02:53 am, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> This particular error occured on my machine with
> baselayout-1.11.12-r2 and therefore I file a bugreport against
> baselayout at bugs.gentoo.org #94120.
are you using lvm2 as your root filesystem ?
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mail
Am 2005-05-30 19:28 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> try doing `emerge sync` and then `emerge lvm2` ... you should have a script
> at /lib/rcscripts/addons/lvm2-start.sh
Well, the file is there. It is actually named
/lib/rcscripts/addons/lvm-start.sh though.
This particular error occured on my m
On Monday 30 May 2005 04:00 pm, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> Am 2005-05-30 10:44 -0400 schrieb Aron Griffis:
> > See Mike's message which started this thread. He addressed lvm2
> > specifically:
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/28317
>
> You mean I should go on the ne
Am 2005-05-30 10:44 -0400 schrieb Aron Griffis:
> See Mike's message which started this thread. He addressed lvm2
> specifically:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/28317
You mean I should go on the nerves of the LVM2 guys with that :) ?
Thats OK if the lvm2 specific stuf
Konsti,
See Mike's message which started this thread. He addressed lvm2
specifically:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/28317
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp9A0I1NA6JH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have an ~amd64 installation and while booting the lvm2 vgs are not
activated anymore, so booting stops there. After logging in for
maintenance (root is not on lvm) I type "vgchange -a y" press Ctrl-D and
ehre we go. The string "vgchange" occures in no file located in
/etc/in
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice
> any
> regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your
> system comes up :)
I have just migrated to baselayout-1.11.12-r4 and everything went
smoothly. Arch x86 with some
* On May 25 18:20, Mike Frysinger (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they
> notice any regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and
> seeing if your system comes up :)
Working great here on ~x86, aside from the initia
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 02:08 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Hmm.. I /did/ have issues with parallel startup a couple revisions back.
> I had disabled that and haven't reenabled it yet. I suppose I should do
> that and bug it now, if it still fails. It /was/ working at one point.
There may still be issu
Mike Frysinger posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 18:20:02 -0400:
> can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice any
> regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your
> system comes up :)
I've been running baselay
16 matches
Mail list logo
