On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:30:20 +0400
Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
> > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200
> > Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
> > > topic?
>
> > A week isn't old. ;)
В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200
> Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
>
> > Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
> > topic?
> A week isn't old. ;) I'll add it once the flu and homework let up for a
> minute.
Why don't
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200
Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
> topic?
>
> With packages as dbus that breaks with FEATURES/USE="test" hand in hand
> with packages like dev-libs/gmp[1] there would really be nice to know if
> you
Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
topic?
With packages as dbus that breaks with FEATURES/USE="test" hand in hand
with packages like dev-libs/gmp[1] there would really be nice to know if
you are supposed to be screwed or helped by FEATURES/USE="test"...
[1](fr
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:46:36 +0200
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 à 20:38 -0600, Ryan Hill a écrit :
> > Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful for
> > developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be foisted on
> > users. Dbus'
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:36:47 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:13:31 Duncan wrote:
> > The proposal then
> > was to turn FEATURES=test on by default for a specific EAPI,
> ... which is never more than a proposal by people not fixing the packages.
> Just FYI, building g
ons 2009-10-07 klockan 16:46 +0200 skrev Gilles Dartiguelongue:
> Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 à 20:38 -0600, Ryan Hill a écrit :
> > Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful for
> > developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be foisted on
> > users. Dbus' c
Patrick Lauer posted on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:36:47 +0200 as excerpted:
>> Now I see this proposal for making it a USE flag, which may or may not
>> be more appropriate, I don't know. I do know I'd love to see someone
>> explain the differences.
> It's a bit more selective. RESTRICT is a global "no
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:13:31 Duncan wrote:
> Ryan Hill posted on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 as excerpted:
> > I'd like to propose a new USE flag, qa-test or a better name, to handle
> > these cases in a consistent way. This would give us a way to
> > differentiate between tests that
Ryan Hill posted on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 as excerpted:
> I'd like to propose a new USE flag, qa-test or a better name, to handle
> these cases in a consistent way. This would give us a way to
> differentiate between tests that everyone should run and tests that only
> devs and arch-tes
10 matches
Mail list logo
