[gentoo-dev] Re: Disenchantment

2006-05-08 Thread Duncan
Peter posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 07 May 2006 16:08:52 -0400: > Anyway, I am a user, and I feel like I can respond. I have participated on > bugzilla, contributed some ebuilds, tried to get a project going (nvidia > unified drivers), and I never felt like I was not encour

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Disenchantment

2006-05-07 Thread Scott Shawcroft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Anyway, I am a user, and I feel like I can respond. I have participated on > bugzilla, contributed some ebuilds, tried to get a project going (nvidia > unified drivers), and I never felt like I was not encouraged to > participate or that my contri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Disenchantment

2006-05-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 07 May 2006 16:08:52 -0400 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | In fact, the only REALLY negative thing that | happened was when Ciaran ripped me a new a---hole because he objected | to the line spacing I used in a proposed ebuild. No, I closed your bug as WONTFIX and invited you to reopen i

[gentoo-dev] Re: Disenchantment

2006-05-07 Thread Peter
On Sun, 07 May 2006 00:00:36 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: snip... > get we have lost one important thing out of sight, gentoo is a distro by > users for users, and the users i think are left out of the loop on this > whole situation (more power to you userrel guys, please prove me wrong), > why wou