Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-04-22 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:25:48 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > Now, these packages have proxy-maint as co-herd, and I'd prefer > > people that are not familiar with ml (ebuilds have their set of > > specificities) not to blindly commit packages because it's > > proxy-maintained. > > I made it

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-04-22 Thread Markos Chandras
On 22 April 2013 10:21, Alexis Ballier wrote: > Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but... > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume >> the package is properly maintained by him so >> we n

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-04-22 Thread Alexis Ballier
Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but... On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + Markos Chandras wrote: > If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume > the package is properly maintained by him so > we never touch it. Does this include herd ? For ml stuff, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 17 March 2013 13:47, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + >> Markos Chandras wrote: >> >>> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume >>> the package is properly maintained by him so >>> we never to

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume >> the package is properly maintained by him so >> we never touch it. > > Sounds fine. I for one am converted (and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + Markos Chandras wrote: > If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume > the package is properly maintained by him so > we never touch it. Sounds fine. I for one am converted (and the packages I maintain in that fashion). jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-05 Thread Markos Chandras
On 5 March 2013 03:41, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer >> and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these >> packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 + Markos Chandras wrote: > A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer > and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these > packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers > goes MIA so we can find an a

[gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-03 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers goes MIA so we can find an alternative mai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers

2006-12-18 Thread Christian Heim
On Monday, 18. December. 2006 08:12, Steve Long wrote: > Yeah, I'd like to see something come of this too; I spoke to someone on IRC > (I've forgotten the login, began with `a') who was really helpful, as I was > asking about p-ming synfig packages. He (I remember it was a bloke) > mentioned I thi

[gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Long
Bryan Østergaard wrote: > Thanks, I believe many users (and devs) will be happy to see improved > policies regarding package removals. I'm also personally very much > looking forward to an official Proxy Maintainers project -proxy > maintaining is one of the things I've been advertising in my own s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-07 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:06:39 +0200 Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight? Don't get confused by all the flames. It's only 10-20 devs out of ~150 who are always fighting - and that's usually only on mailinglists, they work together quite well outsi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Alin Nastac
Natanael Copa wrote: > Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight? > > You don't have to fight. > Its funny, I use gentoo much more that FreeBSD, I'm a freebsd port > maintainer, but nothing for Gentoo (well, im an active bugreporter...) > > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maint

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:18 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote: > > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maintainer update") to > > freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours, even if its not a > > popular port. ... >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-05 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote: > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maintainer update") to > freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours, even if its not a > popular port. When I submit fixes for packages in Gentoo bugzilla it get > stuck for months. They

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 09:52 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: > Natanael Copa wrote: > > Nobody has ever showed interest and I'm not pushing my services on > > anyone. > > > Why exactly you don't want to become a Gentoo dev? Because of the byrocracy? Is it worth it to only maintain one single package?