-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On June 1, 2016 6:46:28 AM PDT, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 15:18, kirjutas Dirkjan Ochtman:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michał Górny
>> wrote:
>> > Excuse me but are you really serious? We are in this swamp b
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 15:18, kirjutas Dirkjan Ochtman:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > Excuse me but are you really serious? We are in this swamp because
> > someone tried to be too smart. And what solution do you propose?
> > Let's add another layer of
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Excuse me but are you really serious? We are in this swamp because someone
> tried to be too smart. And what solution do you propose? Let's add another
> layer of complexity and smartness, for a single variable. Obviously nothing
> can go wr
Dnia 1 czerwca 2016 11:18:30 CEST, Mart Raudsepp napisał(a):
>Ühel kenal päeval, T, 31.05.2016 kell 14:49, kirjutas Michał Górny:
>> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
>> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
>> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to s
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 12:18, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp:
> Ühel kenal päeval, T, 31.05.2016 kell 14:49, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> > Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
> > solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
> > as USE_EXPAND, I woul
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 31.05.2016 kell 14:49, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that
> I'd like afterwards to propo
On 05/31/2016 10:31 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 05/31/2016 05:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hello, everyone.
>>
>> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
>> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
>> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a
On 05/31/2016 05:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that
> I'd like afterwards to propose
Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2016 14:49:26 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that
> I'd like after
On Tue, 31 May 2016 14:53:36 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > Request changing LINGUAS to L10N
> > in make.conf, and make LINGUAS considered an 'advanced variable' for
> > implicit localization control (i.e. passed through to build systems).
> > Recommend clea
Michał Górny schrieb:
Request changing LINGUAS to L10N
in make.conf, and make LINGUAS considered an 'advanced variable' for
implicit localization control (i.e. passed through to build systems).
Recommend clean INSTALL_MASK solution instead.
Can we have this change happen (semi-)automatically, v
Hello, everyone.
Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that
I'd like afterwards to propose to the Council.
Rationale
-
The direct reaso
12 matches
Mail list logo