On Tue, 31 May 2016 14:53:36 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb: > > Request changing LINGUAS to L10N > > in make.conf, and make LINGUAS considered an 'advanced variable' for > > implicit localization control (i.e. passed through to build systems). > > Recommend clean INSTALL_MASK solution instead. > > Can we have this change happen (semi-)automatically, via config_protect? I don't know. We'd have to bind it to some package then. Maybe we should bind it to sys-apps/portage, along with the USE_EXPAND behavior fix. Then users wouldn't directly be affected by LINGUAS removing localizations from all packages. > Also, will there be a transition period where users need to have both > variables set? I'd rather avoid that, since that prolongs the problem with LINGUAS misbehavior. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpfQOH5DW2ND.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
