Donnie-
thanks for the suggestion (guess I need to look through app-portage
before I post next time). I'll check out these tools (though they are
written in perl. I was thinking about using python)
-matt
On 10/26/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
m h wrote:
>
Other than a text editor?
I'd like to have a tool that can add USE flags on a per package or
global level. (I'm doing this in some build scripts and would prefer
just to have a tool, rather than sed or some other shell hackery).
I couldn't find anything via a quick search on google.
Here's my
> >Have you looked at Cargo? http://cargo.codehaus.org/
> >
>
> I figured I'd get this question. i briefly played with cargo. (In
> fact I'm planning on asking the cargo people for feedback as week).
> Perhaps if one are interested in manipulating wars from ant/maven,
> cargo is the way to go.
On 8/4/06, Renat Lumpau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:48:50AM -0600, m h wrote:
> Hey folks-
>
> (Shamelessly copied from my blog[1] )...
> I'm working on an open source tool for managing war files called
> warconfig (warconfig is/should be to
Hey folks-
(Shamelessly copied from my blog[1] )...
I'm working on an open source tool for managing war files called
warconfig (warconfig is/should be to wars as webappconfig is to php
apps). We have a need for this at work. I have a pretty detailed write
up here [2]. Warconfig is a tool for dep
Hi all-
I've googled and RTFM for "SLOTS" which from what I can tell is this paragraph:
With Portage different versions of a single package can coexist on a
system. While other distributions tend to name their package to those
versions (like freetype and freetype2) Portage uses a technology
calle
> If we had an official place where people could complain about ebuilds
> not being stabilized, then I have a feeling most developers would avoid
> it like the plague. Stuff like this is along the same lines as the
> "bump it!!!eleventy-one11!11" bugs which get filed the minute there is a
> new re
On 4/3/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:05, m h wrote:
> > This isn't meant as flamebait. I'm running stable on my laptop and
> > unstable on my desktop. It seems like most KDE release get better
>
Subject says it all.
This isn't meant as flamebait. I'm running stable on my laptop and
unstable on my desktop. It seems like most KDE release get better
over time, so I'm just wondering what the process is with KDE?
thanks
-matt
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
George-
Not sure if you have seen this or not. Check out Conary [1] from
rPath. Think of it as Rpm+Ebuild+Distributed. It's done by some
people who used to be at Redhat and in one of the whitepapers, they
specifically mention portage/ebuild.
-matt
1 - http://wiki.conary.com/FrontPage
On 3/20/
I'm not a gentoo dev (just a satisfied user), but I lurk on this list.
I was at PyCon last month. I would estimate that about 40% of the
people there ran linux on their laptops. The most popular distros
were gentoo and ubuntu. (Not this is not a scientific study, just my
observations from talki
be enough time), but would like to collaborate with
others interested in this. I'm not very familiar with the inner
workings of portage (just a happy gentoo user since 2002), but I am
comfortable with bash and python and have read the developers
documentation.
Thoughts, comments?On 9/8/05, m
Thanks for the response, I guess I'll post to the osx mailing list, but
really my issue isn't about osx per se, but taking the osx portage port
and making it run on any posix system (solaris, osx, flavors of linux
etc) in a sandboxed environment.
> I've read through> the developer documentation an
Hello-
I'm investigating the similarities between portage and openpkg.
More specifically I was wondering if it is possible to take portage and
install in on top of an existing linux installation in its own sandbox
(similar to what openpkg does). I've done some googling and found
the documentatio
14 matches
Mail list logo
