Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for xmingw cross compile toolchain

2005-10-13 Thread Stefan Jones
Mike Frysinger wrote: glanced in the ebuilds and they dont look too bad to me ... this is how we do avr after all ... we punted the avr gcc/binutils ebuilds and now people have to `emerge crossdev && crossdev avr` Ok, many thanks Mike for the input. I guess I better get on with it! Stefan

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for xmingw cross compile toolchain

2005-10-13 Thread Stefan Jones
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 13 October 2005 12:25 pm, Stefan Jones wrote: dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api i'd prefer to see these moved into the normal binutils/gcc ebuilds myself I do not think that

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for xmingw cross compile toolchain

2005-10-13 Thread Stefan Jones
Hi all, I am just wondering about people's option about making a new category, called something like dev-xmingw or similar. At the moment we have in portage: dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api Which gives a usable W32 toolchain

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.12.0 Final - Testing

2005-09-17 Thread Stefan Jones
Phil Richards wrote: | ~ # emerge -puv --newuse gnome | | These are the packages that I would merge, in order: | | Calculating dependencies \ | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-apps/pmount" have been masked. | !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your reque

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
read in the available libraries and there dependencies you need to keep track of which type they are. Anyway, the -i flag to scanelf fixes that and other issues, just group all the data from scanelf by interpreter (so have multiple hashes, one for each interp). Stefan -- Stefan Jones <[EMAIL PR

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
st goes though using both dynamic linkers and sees which one works. This could be done for amd64 I suppose. But first I have an idea to only use scanelf (but that may have issues with 32/64 combined userspaces) which I would want to implement. -- Stefan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-de

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 17:18 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > On x86-64 the native ELFs do not use ld-linux.so.2, but > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead. Okey, thanks, using /usr/include/gnu/lib-names.h would soon sort out that problem at compile time! Stefan -- Stefan Jones <[EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
Stefan Jones wrote: So I have started making a small C program which does the "Checking dynamic linking consistency..." part of the revdep-rebuild program (I think this the the most time intensive part). This program can then be called by the script. So far all I see the program nee

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
cribed as changing API between minor revisions of libraries. Will think a bit more. Stefan -- Stefan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
ig -p" to gain a list of all the libraries, put them in a hash table and then use scanelf. All seems good, Stefan -- Stefan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-13 Thread Stefan Jones
build.3_rebuild Any other LD_?? env variables I would need to consider? Also anyone have any opinions or caveats I should take into account? Thanks, Stefan -- Stefan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list