Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: deltacow (Scott Stoddard)

2006-02-08 Thread Scott Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I've got another new victim to present :) Scott is joining the amd64 team that he's already been a part of for the last few months helping out as an AT (arch tester). Scott has experience with C/C++, Java, Python, SQL and is a long time Gentoo user. Scott write

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-19 Thread Scott Stoddard
rked about 10 hours this week on Gentoo stuff (it's all the time I could afford); not stuff for me -- I couldn't personally care at all if xcb or rman work on amd64 as they're applications that I don't have a particular use for, but I'm more than happy to put in th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Scott Stoddard
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Don't forget the "... and make a reasonable commitment for a substantial period of time". In other words, not ATs, who are ATs because they lack the experience or commitment to be fully fledged developers. Far easier to withdraw the GLEP and just ask for anon cvs access fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Scott Stoddard
Kurt Lieber wrote: What purpose does this serve? This would create all sorts of confusion. Right now, you can meet someone in IRC and make a reasonable assumption that their email address is @gentoo.org. This would confuse things horribly imo. What about people like me that span multiple roles

Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

2005-11-18 Thread Scott Stoddard
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:44:53 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Maybe a new GLEP is in order? It makes sense to do it now since infra | is going to be setting up alias' anyway. While we're at it possibly | an @dev.g.o as well (as someone mentioned)? That way t