Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Rumen Yotov
Duncan написа: "Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400: I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I don't know what hackery has to take place to do that, but I'm sure someone out there does. Wh

[gentoo-dev] OT: was 2007.0 release

2007-04-13 Thread Rumen Yotov
Hi, Tempted by this recent thread, wanna just voice my thoughts. Can't there be some way (GWN, Bug, some general-purpose IRC channel etc.) on which users could at least be informed that work is under way to release 2007.0, with some kind of feedback. Releng could just choose to ignore it at all, bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-30 Thread Rumen Yotov
Hi, On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:28:52 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:42 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote: > > > > > i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account > > when it comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo. > > It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cultural Differences (was: Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla)

2007-03-25 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:37:04 +0200 "Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/07, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well I'm a native speaker [...] > > Yeah, right. May I remind you that you're a USian ? > > :o) > > Denis. Hi, May be a little OT, but just two of four ancie

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation (was: Project Sunrise resumed)

2006-07-30 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:50:40 -0400 "Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Continue with *top-posting* as it is. Does Gentoo gives more choises to users or not? With the freedom/choise comes the responsibility (if anything breaks). Gentoo is known not to be for *everybody* (unless he/she

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Official overlay support

2006-03-23 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Thursday 23 March 2006 20:43, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 23/03/06, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Using a remote overlays is rather simple, just do "emerge layman". > > Read the einfo and then "man layman". > > It works

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Official overlay support

2006-03-23 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Thursday 23 March 2006 19:16, Duncan wrote: > Chris Bainbridge posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > excerpted below, on Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:47:13 +: > > Adding the ebuilds to overlays is one option, but > > then other users will be expected to find an overlay with their > > package in, and then

Re: [gentoo-dev] ERROR: gnome-base/bonobo-1.0.22 failed.

2005-11-02 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 11:41 -0600, Dale wrote: > Rumen Yotov wrote: > > >Hi, > >An essential feature of portage is the ability to have two/three/more > >different (usually major) versions of the same package installed at the > >same time. > >Examples: GTK

Re: [gentoo-dev] ERROR: gnome-base/bonobo-1.0.22 failed.

2005-11-02 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 10:56 -0600, Dale wrote: > Well, it's me again. LOL > > I am trying to successfully finish a revdep-rebuild and am having a bit > of fun with it. It wants to recompile gnome-base/bonobo-1.0.22 and it > fails to finish the compile with this: ...SKIP... > > checking for GTK -

Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_setup() and sandbox

2005-09-22 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:47:17 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should pkg_setup() be run in a sandbox? > > The current reasons to not have it sandboxed include: > > - ebuilds need to add users > - ... (any others?) > > So, would it make sense to sandbox pkg_setup() and only unm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles

2005-08-28 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:01 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Brian Harring wrote: > > > >> I don't recall having kde/gtk crap turned on by default when I first > >> showed up. Maybe I'm missing something; regardless, the defaults > >> (which should be minimal from my st

Re: [gentoo-dev] flawfinder rats logs

2005-06-20 Thread Rumen Yotov
Tavis Ormandy wrote: >--On Monday, June 20, 2005 07:34:11 +0300 Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>Recently began using flawfinder& rats and they're working (logging >>things). For now don't have time to look at the logs (

[gentoo-dev] flawfinder rats logs

2005-06-19 Thread Rumen Yotov
Hi, Recently began using flawfinder& rats and they're working (logging things). For now don't have time to look at the logs (beside *me* needing more time to check them), so is there some place/person which collects/is_interested in such info. Maybe some meta-bug or other, or just send they upstrea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Even More Portage Bashrc Fun

2005-06-13 Thread Rumen Yotov
Michael Tindal wrote: >Hello, > >So a long time ago solar wrote a bashrc for portage, and posted it on >this mailing list for everyone to see. I took it, and started extending >it with various things of my own design, and some contributions from >others. I've since updated it with the things sol

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-25 Thread Rumen Yotov
Paul Varner wrote: >On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >>yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to >>get >>new baselayout stable asap', we're serious >> >>so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice >>an

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-20 Thread Rumen Yotov
Rumen Yotov wrote: >Lance Albertson wrote: > > > >>Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his hard >>>work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Rumen Yotov
Lance Albertson wrote: >Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > >>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his hard >>work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer to >>help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and hopefully also providing a >>package for

Re: [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES

2005-04-30 Thread Rumen Yotov
Jason Stubbs wrote: >On Sunday 01 May 2005 00:30, Rumen Yotov wrote: > > >>PS: a day or two ago mentioned that i'm using per-package FEATURES in >>'/etc/portage/package.features-file' ("-collision-protect") so was >>thinking about doing the

Re: [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES

2005-04-30 Thread Rumen Yotov
Maurice van der Pot wrote: >Hey people, > >A lot of ebuilds still fail when "test" is in FEATURES. > >It's understandable that fixing this is a low priority thing, but what >I would like to propose is to either fix the tests or disable them. >The latter would be the thing to do for devs who are

Re: [gentoo-dev] How well supported is collision-protect?

2005-04-27 Thread Rumen Yotov
Chris Gianelloni wrote: >On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:14 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > >>Uh, I did not expect such a response. I personally have a whole bunch of >>collisions on my system, most of which man pages. >> >>http://gg3.net/~chutz/gentoo/collisions >> >>I'll see to report them. >>