On 17.12.2012 11:23, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 17/12/2012 11:19, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for
/var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to
make world and config files to be put elsewhere :P).
I would say let
On 17.07.2012 16:49, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
After changing these for years, I finally realized that the defaults are
correct:
# postconf -d readme_directory html_directory
readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.8.9/readme
html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.8.9/html
Do we r
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:24:25 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 02:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to
> > add to metadata if you want. Thanks:
> > dev-util/ciabot-svn
> > media-sound/teamspeak-client-bin
> > media-sound/teamsp
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:04:56 -0500
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > this is especially important for the people doing arch keywording
> > since they make a ton of commits. i'm looking at you armin76.
>
> One thing I don't get amidst this whole conversation is why I should
> sign a Manifest file when
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:11:32 +0200
Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> So I think a USE="vp8" or USE="webm" (probably the first) to enable
> decoding, and USE="vpx" should be used to fine tune what
> implementation to use. Having USE="vp8" (no USE="vpx" specified) in
> make.conf should give you support fo
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:31:04 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> But if you built and linked against openssl-0.9.7*, then upgraded to
> openssl-0.9.8, you can expect breakage.
But can't this be kind of ignored and solves the Gentoo way? If the
binpkg does not work, don't install it and simply rebu
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0100
Beber wrote:
> So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in
> names function of USE, like :
> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
> tcpdump
>
> USE="+chroot +ipv6 -ssl -test -samba -smi"
> is placed
> under
Hello world!
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:24 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
> > As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
> > We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
> > (eselect itself would stay in app
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 08:48 +, Duncan wrote:
> Philipp Riegger posted
> 1243321504.9661.14.ca...@hspc30.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de, excerpted
> below, on Tue, 26 May 2009 09:05:03 +0200:
>
> > I don't see the connection between the email Fabio wrote and your
> &g
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:27 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Philipp Riegger
> wrote:
> > And all this layer thing Fabio was talking about. I did not try it and I
> > did not read the code, but I think it makes things much more
> &g
Hi Duncan,
I don't see the connection between the email Fabio wrote and your
answer. Do you want to say, that you agree that he's doing what i
described and that it works the way i described it? I doubt it. If you
really care, could you answer my first email and state there the
problems you see wi
Good morning,
I want to talk about improved binary package support for Gentoo. About
1-2 months ago there already was a discussion about this on gentoo-soc@
and on bugzilla [1]. If I remember correctly, there were no devs
involved in the discussion, so I thought I'll post my thoughts here.
I know
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 06:14 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> A group/user is created when no other ebuild has the dependency and is
> removed when the last ebuild has been removed which needs it?
This blows up if you have to uninstall and reinstall a package, caused
by blockers or whatever. Files
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 18:13 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I find the persisten-net-generator.rules particularly annoying
> (for various reasons including, but not limited to system images
> and system cloning).
>
> So I have an empty file of that name and happily nuke whatever
> comes along wi
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 01:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> So, what do you guys think?
> >
> > One problem i see is changing versions in the tree but not puting the
> > changes to the wip ebuilds in an overlay or somewhere else. Is there a
> > system to email any changes done to ebuilds maintaine
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:06 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> So, what do you guys think?
One problem i see is changing versions in the tree but not puting the
changes to the wip ebuilds in an overlay or somewhere else. Is there a
system to email any changes done to ebuilds maintained by developer
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:48 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> It's not a vulnerability in Rules du Jour. It's a bunch of spammers
> attacking the Rules du Jour servers and ISP. SARE has also been down a
> whole bunch over the last couple of months due to the same attack.
Which will probably never happen
On 02.05.2007, at 02:32, Marius Mauch wrote:
a) cost (in terms of runtime, resource usage, additional deps)
Tools for this could be implemented in the package manager. The
package has to be installed and tested by the developer, so if
portage would show the times for each stage or the tim
On 30.01.2007, at 11:40, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch
| > | to system on at configure time as done for other libs?
| >
| > At something like five megs of code per application?
|
| If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like mini
On 30.01.2007, at 09:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch to
| system on at configure time as done for other libs?
At something like five megs of code per application?
If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like minimal?
Philipp
--
On 19.12.2006, at 12:07, Mark Kowarsky wrote:
We are currently dominating the southern hemisphere (with our army of
5), but world domination is still a very distant prospect.
But lot's of world dominations started with domination in australia.
So don't give up. :-)
Philipp
--
gentoo-dev@g
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs
since
the titles would be uniform.
I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something
like a
specialised bug system for ebuilds, where you have to enter the
packa
On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mike Bonar wrote:
On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs
since the titles would be uniform.
I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something like
a specialised bug system for ebuilds, where you have to enter the
package
On Apr 7, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
On the other hand, this problem does have a solution--another
level of
indirection. Anybody who wishes, dev or user, could spend time
tracking Gentoo development (through bugs and the mailing lists) and
submit status reports to the GWN.
On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Jakub Moc wrote:
I bet there's a bug open for it.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482
. How's portage 2.1 getting along? I notice it gets frequent
updates.
The gentoo-portage-dev list is the place to follow this.
Also, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_b
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Philippe Trottier wrote:
Recipe for disaster, specially in a place like mine where sparc,
alpha, x86_64
and ppc32/64 mix... not counting ia64 for a test run soon...
If you really want to do this, someone has to make a rendezvous a
la Apple.
Where not only distcc
26 matches
Mail list logo
