Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:52:49 -0600
Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's making the assumption that anyone looked at it, of course.
Please note comment #9 on
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198346. It was still ~8 days
from then that the
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:32:09 -0600
Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps you should have explicitly stated in the bug that it was for
security reasons and thus a priority. Make things easy for the arch
teams -- if you have useful information like that, p
When arch people get dozens to hundreds of bug emails per day, no, it's
not. A simple "this is now a security issue, see bug blah" makes it an
awful lot easier for arch people to prioritise -- emails that merely
show blockers added or removed tend to get ignored because a) they're
almost always me
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:18:09 -0600
Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191550 - it took > 2
months for mips to keyword it.
Security bugs are normally supposed to have enhanced priority for
keywording, etc.
Pe
And what is the impact of that holdup? Have you explained why you
consider that to be a priority to the arch teams in question?
We had a sec bug on net-snmp that was held up due to
dev-python/setuptools not being ~mips. The net-snmp folks added a
python module to their distribution, and I ad
Steve Long wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Ask for forgiveness, not permission.
++ I think anything that streamlines the process is a good thing. (Obviously
I don't know enough about all the changes to comment on specifics.) Not
saying it should be done recklessly, eg SRC_URI changes. How about a s
Christian Heim wrote:
On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
bind's maintaining?
What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind
herd, to hel
Today, being a dev (which essentially means having commit access
to Gentoo repositories) is mostly about taking responsibility for what
is finally committed.
FWIW, FreeBSD has a long and glorious history of proxy-maintainership in
their ports tree -- that model seems to work pretty well for th
Steve Long wrote:
Andrej Kacian wrote:
As for the poisonous atmosphere - I don't know, I feel very good among the
developers, and am still enjoying working on the tree just like on the day
I joined. Don't let few loud flamers ruin your day.
Thanks for that Andrej. Makes me feel much better :)
He's not going to waste someone else's time, and as he said there will be
compatibility with current configuration files, I don't think there's any
downside to users.
FWIW, speaking as a user, I value stability over speed. But if I have a
promise of stability (i.e. my current configs will s
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Steve Dibb wrote:
>> @devs,
>>
>> I'd like to propose a new herd: religion. The herd would take care of
>> the Bible and religious software along with any genealogy programs in
>> the tree, which there actually are a few of. Sword, gnomesword, sword
>> modules, bibletime, gra
Markus Ullmann wrote:
Christian Heim schrieb:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Martin Jackson (also known as
mjolnir40k - on IRC at least) our latest addition joining the netmon herd.
Please welcome Martin as a new fellow developer among us !
Really looking forward to work wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
