Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-lang/ruby-cvs

2007-04-13 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
sely tracked, however -- they will be at 1.0 in a few weeks, I think. -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) http://borasky-research.net/ If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract

2007-03-25 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
there are legal restrictions on "sponsorship", etc. Before modifying the "Social Contract", I'd recommend consulting an attorney with expertise in such matters. The last thing Gentoo needs is major legal hassles. -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PG

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving USE=server to global

2007-03-19 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
ng the documentation and examples or suppressing an option for a package where it doesn't work. It turns out to be easier for me to manage things that way than to have a humongous package.use and a few options in make.conf. -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST,

Re: [gentoo-dev] moving USE=server to global

2007-03-18 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
build "vnc" I use it to get a VNC server. Maybe make a local "vnc-server" USE flag for that one. -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/ If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems

2007-03-17 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I think you're massively underestimating the requirements of the average user, what with the tree as complex as it is these days. Most users now: * Have to use external repositories * Have to handle at least some keywording overrides themselves * Have to have some way of m

Re: [gentoo-dev] A User's View of the Code of Conduct

2007-03-17 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Larry Lines wrote: The network analysts at one of my jobs actually make the new people install Gentoo on a box just for the experience. Unless there's a compelling business argument for this practice, I consider it an abuse of authority. Does this practice increase revenues or decrease costs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Distrowatch

2007-03-15 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
e is worth consideration, the process of adopting the Communication CoC and the structures required to implement it be followed through in the best interests of all developers and users of the Gentoo project. +1, as they say on other lists, with the proviso that the discussion continue until all hav

Re: [gentoo-dev] A User's View of the Code of Conduct

2007-03-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
7;s about repetition, muscle memory, rote learning, etc. -- not about Red Hat being "better" than Gentoo or the other way around. -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/ If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems

2007-03-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
re community distro". Somehow Gentoo needs to at least find a marketable defendable niche and some kind of corporate sponsorship. Maybe embedded will turn out to be that niche -- I'd love to have even 1/4 of Portage on something like a Zaurus or "iPhone". -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/ If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Distrowatch

2007-03-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
hen it gets trashed. But unacceptable behavior of anyone -- a developer or a user -- is just that -- *unacceptable*. And a lack of an effective way of dealing with it *will* kill Gentoo. -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/

[gentoo-dev] A User's View of the Code of Conduct

2007-03-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
te support. Finally, let me add that I've never personally experienced what I would consider unacceptable treatment from a Gentoo community member, developer, user, interested bystander, etc. Perhaps if I had, it would change my views. But, as the saying goes, "where there's sm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents

2005-07-05 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Of course not -- Grunthos the Flatulent was the inventor of vaporware Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: >On 7/5/05, Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>2) This pointless debate will eventually die, because if it doesn't >> I'm going to start quoting select excerpts from Vogon Poet

Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents

2005-07-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Not to mention all the software written in Java ... and other things in the Portage tree like VMWare ... skype ... acroread ... Really ... you can take those out of the Portage tree. I can -- and often do -- download them directly and install them. On Gentoo, CentOS, Debian, Fedora and Windows. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Enterprise deployment tools

2005-06-22 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Thierry Carrez wrote: >Hi folks, > >I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop >deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of). > >As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but >quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help. > >There

Re: [gentoo-dev] Acquiring a deeper understanding of Gentoo

2005-06-15 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I'm not a developer ... and I'm not in California ... but I am a Gentoo bigot and I'm certainly willing to help out ... as are most Gentoo users/developers. The documentation and forums are excellent, as are the IRC channels. As far as installation is concerned, the complexity pretty much depends

Re: Fw: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-07 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Matthew Marlowe wrote: >A clueful sysadmin with gentoo is a far superior arrangement >provided the rate of hardware installs isn't too much. For very large >environments with 100+ boxes, I'd definitly agree with you that >gentoo has a long way to go. > > Well ... as far as I'm concerned, "clu

Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-06 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: >I've got a Zaurus; it's running some kind of Linux >and I'll probably put Gentoo on it when I get some spare cycles, >provided Gentoo runs on the 6000. But I'm sure as hell not gonna try to >run R or TeXmacs or Maxima on it! > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-06 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I'm not a developer, but I'm a Gentoo bigot and I'd like to join the discussion :). Aron Griffis wrote: > >In my humble opinion, Gentoo is missing too many points to be an >enterprise Linux. We commit to a live tree. We don't have true QA, >testing or tinderbox. We don't have paid staff, alpha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hi guys !!

2005-06-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I think wxMaxima came up on the gentoo-science list; there may already be a request for an ebuild and someone may even have done it. Meanwhile, ordinary Maxima, including the standard X interface, is already in Portage. So are emacs, xemacs and texmacs, all of which provide a user-friendly interfac

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I don't use "kasteroids" so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue. Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: >On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:16, LostSon wrote: > > >> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves

Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX

2005-05-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
There are also some serious performance issues with I/O. Xen is a much better way to go in the long run. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70161 for the team that's working to bring Xen to life in Gentoo, and the Xen home page at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/performanc

Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware

2005-05-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Gentoo pre-loaded? Isn't that a contradiction in terms? Seriously though, I too work with xSeries, as well as IBM desktops, and I've loaded Debian, Gentoo and half a dozen other distros on them without incident, as well as pre-Fedora Red Hat and RHEL clones. Left to my own devices (pun intended)

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware

2005-05-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I'm not a lawyer, even in the USA. Maybe it's different in Germany, but here in the USA, the relationships between for-profit and not-for-profit organizations are highly regulated. IBM can (and has) given hardware or sold hardware at lower prices to educational institutions. IBM has made major cont

Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware

2005-05-04 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I was just going to say something similar, although I'm not an employee of IBM. Gentoo's parent organization is non-profit, and IBM is a for-profit international corporation. That means, at least in the USA, that any such agreement would need to be negotiated and approved by what Stan Freberg refer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: metadata cleaning

2005-04-23 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I played around with Squeak a while back. The license is non-free according to the folks who work with Richard Stallman. It's an interesting environment, but I wasn't willing to learn Smalltalk in order to use it, nor was I willing to adopt their style, their GUI, etc. So ... I won't jump up and do

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable

2005-04-10 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Should I *not* emerge this gcc? I usually hold off on gcc updates when I'm in the middle of other testing. Right now, I'm doing a lot of beta testing with R and Atlas, so I held off when the latest gcc showed up after "emerge sync". Spider wrote: On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 16:22 -0400, Mike Frysinge