On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:43:10PM +, Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer
Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2005 23:26, Omer Cohen wrote:
> > I've been working with it since it came out.
> >
> > And I made big projects with more then a few classes and objects and it all
> > worked fine,
Why not reverse it:
1. *DONT* unmerge an old lib (the *.so.* file) if the soname changes due
an upgrade. Just leave this single file on the file-system
2. Scan your system in regular intervals for unused old shared libs
This seems much simpler and doesn't break systems.
Jürgen
> Well, thi
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:50:42 +0200 Jochen Maes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | He's a yoga-meditating Java monkey what seems to me an excellent mix.
> | I'm sure some off u guys/gals will suck this up by stating that Java
> | sucks..
