On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:43:10PM +0000, Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists wrote: > On Friday 22 April 2005 23:26, Omer Cohen wrote: > > I've been working with it since it came out. > > > > And I made big projects with more then a few classes and objects and it all > > worked fine, I didn't have any problems with it. > > It's not like a group of 100 people from microsoft tested it and said it's > > ok, the entire community of PHP developers agreed it's alright and aprooved > > it. > > we're talking about one of the biggest OC communities. > > > > I believe it's stable enough to get marked as stable on the portage tree. > > > > Regarding the remark of not overriding the system, what I ment is that I > > there's no reason to manualy unmask a stable product.. > > I strongly agree. We actually lost a client recently because we adhere to > the > stable tree of Gentoo but our PHP was too dated for them (they wanted PHP > 5.x). 5.x is in portage since many months. Just use keywords. Just customize. Even brand-new Redhat Enterprise 4.0 provides 4.3.9-x only.
funnily enough the PHP Guys recommended Apache 1.3 only for a long time. Jürgen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
