return, I hope that the people who can still derive enjoyment from Gentoo
continue to do so.
Infra, please remove my accounts at your earliest convenience.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
s not appear to line-wrap.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF3JDxdKvgdVioq28RAoFiAJ9zwbp02+R2NXui2mRcvggQPxeU7QCbBBWq
QoJHc/OPnat3SJfYZqDeQ4A=
=OgS1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
low to respond and a bit under staffed, but
that burning hole in your committing pocket can wait.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
;d at least give us a bug indicating why you
felt the need to drop our keywords from a revision or version bump of a
package.
Not to be a hard ass, but repeat offenders will be reported to both the QA
and DevRel teams.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
n Blade 100 and Blade 150 Sun
workstations.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing said, Gentoo Linux/SPARC normally does try to handle Security
issues before others if the others aren't critical.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFR3IBdKvgdVioq28RArMdAJ49AsBl3DjtA5n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whomever added the oracle use flag,
Please mask it on all architectures Oracle doesn't support on Linux. Or
better yet, mask it everywhere and only unmask it on the architectures
that support Oracle.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/
he removal
Consider yourself warned. Violation of any of these will cause the
jforman death goat squad to be dispatched to your location for a discreet
hit. For repeat offenders, public executions will be had, with Spanky
hosting.
Thanks :)
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
oblematic.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing the license by considering anyone else's
opinion but your own :-P
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:56:01 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> huh ? i think you're thinking of per-package use.mask, not
> per-package use defaults
Oh yeah good call.
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
kage foo fails to build with the perl use flag
enabled but only on arch bar, arch bar can mask it but no other arches
are affected).
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
then they would not be optional,
and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something?
This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature that
folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to be on
by default.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wev
96368 some time
ago. For us it would be very very handy to be able to do this rather than
lots of stuff like "foo? (!arch bar baz)" and the like as well as printing
out additional ewarns to note that this use flag doesn't work on this arch
for this package that no one ever sees.
m going to cut my list
> short as it's already ridiculously long ...
Thanks for the nomination! :) However I don't feel that I currently
have the time to put towards this that it needs.
Here is hoping towards next year :)
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
m.
Also as you knew Seamonkey was broken on at least one architecture
before you did this, why didn't you attempt to let us know when
exactly you were doing this so we could have some working alternative in
place?
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tible replacement that is
anywhere near as stable as XMMS is.
Until audacious or bmpx or the latest fork of a GTK2 based XMMS derivative
is on par with XMMS, I'd like to ask that it stay in the tree (assuming no
security issues pop up that we decide not to patch).
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wev
bad things.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
happen :)
Good luck with future endeavours and if you ever happen to come across
a soft ice cream machine for the dev lounge...
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
this email is really for the birds,
please consult your friendly neighborhood developer handbook as this is
all in there too.
Remember, only you can save the goats from jforman.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Latest list:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202
Returns a 404
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s kind of behavior.
I'm not trying to be a party pooper here, but breaking the portage tree
should never be an acceptable answer.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ure, if you are going to mask a package that will be
superseded by another, please make sure not to mask the original until
the replacement has matching keywords. This is especially important
when the package has stable keywords.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
D
e are anywhere near critical, then I think a lot of us non-x86
arch monkeys have a lot of work on our hands.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
#x27;t even onto gcc-3.4 in testing keywords yet in the
non-testing profiles.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
today and is now marked unstable.
Is there any particular reason that the utf8 use flag was re-introduced
rather than using the unicode use flag like everything else does (and was
standardized on)?
Regards,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
efore the maintainer does it, not
> keeping it in unstable while the maintainer wants to mark it stable,
> right?
Mostly us needing to stabilize sooner, but in some cases the opposite is
true as well (for instance cases where it works for some but not
others).
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgprD5XNtoZFc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it. This includes shells as well as regular
programming languages.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpNWIIeP2Vm3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
#x27;t happen.
This is the current policy, though it gets violated quite often.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpSfTkJaP7MF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
have times where a
particular arch team may need to stabilize a package sooner in the case
where earlier versions are broken.
This is not entirely uncommon to see packages that used to compile with
stable keywords no longer compile after a period of time.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgp7aZ5u0rxVe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ase file
> bugs in Bugzilla as normal.
I've filed notes in the tracker bug you put in the Gentoo Bugzilla but
other than your initial response, I haven't gotten any feedback on them.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpjcekTCVegI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s there a reason you folks are using a non-gentoo bug system to work on
this? It seems a bit redundant and un-needed in my layman's
perspective.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgp5hCWdFPPqk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
le or testing keywords for any
architectures when you do this cleanup.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpj72TsQGbdV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
one you've added it for.
Thanks! :)
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC/+WcdKvgdVioq28RAh9JAJ9MEkIARHmkFq6nZ/hUa+46ergbcgCgsab4
i157VQ04ba6/iPcyaIorblc=
=lZN5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the DRI list as the XVR-100 Sun framebuffer is a rebranded ATI Radeon 7000
VE. I have one I can test with/on once I get back from LWE.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC+uyAdKvgdVioq28RAvefAKC2MrZSO5O89ui/
re missing from this list but have
notified the SPARC team in the past about an ability to keyword or if
you need to update what information is on the list.
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpPYIrbu4zLK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eLog[1] is your friend. Live it, love it, use it!
[1] - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.12
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpDFfKrLxm0p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the workaround is
thwarting their use flag preferences (unless the arch monkey is nice
enough to put in some einfo love).
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
pgpd1g1t86sYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ot; type reason, wait for the maintainer arch.
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCpxtqdKvgdVioq28RAjm7AJ9psRHMb8LYB6KqAhdi/jAzKj2j8ACglq3s
s8L6J7Ims/ZPt6upqMrgtlU=
=M1Z0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
Agreed, the PPC team is very good at arbitrarily marking things stable
whenever they feel like it, and often times before the maintainer does.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1
est way to ensure you get the testing and verification you want on this
is to file a bug, assign it to yourself or your herd, and CC the relevant
arches.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1
r the update! :)
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFClL2+dKvgdVioq28RAp+lAKC3y4nauFnN5Myamn8SCrv2db30kACgo5cN
MkTIG1i6IsxoMXzMbvUKbIk=
=VdEv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
hat we cannot depend on assuming that trivial changes for me == works for
you if we want to have some level of Q in QA.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCjkP3dKvgdVioq28RAqw+AJ9yuqHTVZSsdnfyFt9PgJSm3jt+2Q
g
job, but it is what we as architecture teams do. Please respect
architecture keywording like you were trying to make changes to a package
someone else maintains.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
ages on each system. I'm going to hazard a
guess that a majority of systems that have openldap installed have more
than one or two packages depending on openldap (and probably aren't
dedicated LDAP servers). For those folks who use LDAP for various thing,
I could see this as being a ve
for spending whatever financial resources it can
get.
Plus I'd hate to see the decision-making process over what was deemed
worth the bounties would be. Even if just bugzilla voiting was used,
that could be heavily influenced in negative ways (i.e. "If you vote for
my bug, I'll vote for
On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:54:20 +0200
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> net-im/bitlbee
Fixed.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpcThbNhS88K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uch effect on the general
running of emerge at all, actually, except for updating the cache after
syncing.
Does that include the about >=10 second delay when emerge is first run on
a box after a reboot before you get any visible output on the screen, or
is that an entirely different problem?
statement of the delay (low end SPARC64 systems
for instance). The initialization delay of portage is very much felt
here, either via emerge or other tools like equery.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1
Not very many last I checked.
Best for now to deal with whether you want Reply-To to be altered or use
Reply-To all.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCXs48dKvgdVioq28RAgnmAJwOTrTSJcDEZqKGaaNUNh6c
oment.
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCXC29dKvgdVioq28RArnCAJ9d1vj+TJ4OJ1D28lR2N/4pUKmp3QCfdHyh
KBhsMwzKCVaBYLoE7IgsEE0=
=7RZU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Jason Wever wrote:
| And why would we not want to present the default Apache index.html to our
| users?
Installing anything as a default page into /var/www/localhost/htdocs/ is
dangerous. If the Apache
And why would we not want to present the default Apache index.html to our
users?
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpEhKZvracrI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Apache
more compliant with how it is provided upsteam to be putting in a branded
default front page.
Also if we're stuck with the branding, can we come up with a page that is
at least a little more professional looking or a little less like someone
trying to be witty?
Thanks,
--
Jason Wever
Gent
54 matches
Mail list logo
