On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:43:11 -0500 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that the arch teams shouldn't be marking packages stable in > advance of when the the maintainer thinks it's ready. At the same > time, it's the respective arch teams, as "owners" of their entire > stable tree, who (in my opinion) should have the final "okay" on a > package going stable, since they're the ones with experience of the > entire stable tree. Does that make a bit more sense? For the most part, this makes sense, However we do have times where a particular arch team may need to stabilize a package sooner in the case where earlier versions are broken. This is not entirely uncommon to see packages that used to compile with stable keywords no longer compile after a period of time. Cheers, -- Jason Wever Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgp7aZ5u0rxVe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
