On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:21, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> I don't
> care what order they're in. It's not like there are 100 keywords or
> something,
Wait until ppc-od, x86-fbsd and amd64-fbsd keywords make their way into the
tree... the problem there is worst, and the alphabetical order is really
on, so ...
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpjgm2KXOM91.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 15:42, Aaron Walker wrote:
> sed is still aliased to gsed, no?
Yes but I don't trust sed calls which depends on specific behaviour of gnu
tools.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gen
kage, and
this is good, but I'm not sure about the sed expression.
You tried it with bsd sed anyway? :)
So the problem is: the patch will remove the need for all the patches? In this
case, I think I'd love it :)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gent
ot using that provider and know noone reliable which uses gentoo and
that provider to test with).
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgp8oSOf3cMW9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Probably with gcc4 many of the errors are now shared by both compilers as it
turned up even more strict than before.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpZOIrlDHiyb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
find why kde 3.4 can't go in any stable state soon.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgp7V6LsHvdPv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 07 May 2005 22:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I realize there's a ton of stuff to take care of, but since the newer
> windows version support 'sharing apps' among multiple user accounts,
> there just might be a way to make them root-owned, or some such...
I don't think this is possible
On Saturday 07 May 2005 01:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> funny you should mention that as i've been slowly deleting the
> 'virtual/libc' DEPEND from ebuilds as i see it
Quite fair this.
Well okay, we'll wait for ciaran's GLEP :)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video,
On Friday 06 May 2005 19:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as lead games dev i think media-libs makes sense
I'd prerfere base-system in this case ;)
> ha trumped you !
*speak of something with sed*
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.o
On Friday 06 May 2005 17:38, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, it is just a driver (and then some) for the frame buffer ... but what
> do you do with the fb other than play media ? :):)
Games? Something-other-than-media-which-is-not-yet-present? :)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 06:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ok, the maintainer just put 'utf8' into use.local.desc for no reason ...
> the packages dont actually use it
About vlc, it used to use it. It was renamed to unicode some time ago.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD
Ok I was a bit quiet lately but that's only because I was vocal elsewhere
(irc) ;)..
You can find attached a little script I wrote last night to get a count of
files in $FILESDIR for packages to make sure they just are the few needed, as
I'm moving the patches for packages which needs 2 or more
Hi,
Just another consult-post just to see the opinion of the developers (and of
the users who know what to say :) ).
There are a few packages which, under some strange autotools combinations
which not always are reproducible, suffer from an error like
Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `autoto
e an overkill, imho.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpNkZa2mnJF3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 24 April 2005 23:08, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Also if who approves is _not_ the mentor / sane a 4 eyes check is always
> a good thing (TM) it's the way kernel develop is going from years now,
> right?
I think that doing something like that, surely will increase safety, but will
also driv
On Thursday 21 April 2005 23:29, Greg KH wrote:
> Why is it a useflag at all? Does this mean I can create a new "usb"
> flag? :):)
There's already:
usb - Adds USB support to applications that have optional USB support (e.g.
cups)
it usually enables support for libusb or other things like that.
There are currently 6 (7 after I'll commit new ffmpeg) ieee1394 use.local
flags.
I think this is worth moving it as a global useflag.
Someone disagrees?
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpvbOTAhB5Om.pgp
De
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 22:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> erm i was trying to trick you into doing arch/os specific ones, not just os
> specific :):)
I think the only arch-specific ones I know on global are the
mmx/mmxex/mmx2/3dnow/3dnowex/sse flags.
I really don't know what other can be removed as
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 01:32, Torsten Veller wrote:
> net-dns/djbdns
If nobody wants this, I can take it, I'm using it on my systems.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpxxEGKXlQeY.pgp
Description: PGP si
On Monday 18 April 2005 20:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if by commit you mean the profiles then i think you should go make a list
> of specific USE flags and drop it onto the gentoo-dev list before
> committing :p:p -mike
Ok here we are :) This is the list of *global* flags which are linux specific
On Monday 18 April 2005 04:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this probably falls along side the USE refactoring someone else suggested
> where we use.mask everything in base/use.mask that is arch-specific and
> only unmask in appropriate profiles
So what? This, imho, should be done also for alsa and oss
On Friday 15 April 2005 16:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> you have an execuse ... you havent taken the dev quiz yet which has a PIC
> usage question ;)
Well actually now I taken it :) but the patches where previous to that :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/
pgpS
On Thursday 07 April 2005 17:39, Luca Barbato wrote:
> last time I checked the maintree gcc has the fix for the 'consider
> whatever .h as extern "C" ' ancient workaround, that now breaks C++
> templates. the standard gcc provided by apple or the gcc from darwin
> branch not.
Well, I've tried that
On Thursday 07 April 2005 17:17, Luca Barbato wrote:
> gcc is non standard and broken, ld is non standard. vim is non standard.
Actually, pure gcc on OSX is broken. Just try to build yourself a vanilla gcc
and try it with some C++ lib, it will fail because it needs a fix which is
nog going to be
25 matches
Mail list logo
