Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-06 Thread Collins Richey
My $.02 after reading a lot of discussions on the CentOS (ie free REHL4) list is this: 1. Many Enterprise users are looking for an SLA, ie someone who will guarantee to fix anything that breaks in a specified period of time. Such users have the big bucks to pay for such a guarantee. I'm sure that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Collins Richey
On 5/8/05, W.Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Oz, cellphone is only used in american movies, here they are called > "mobile phones" (formal), "mobiles" (common usage) and "mob" when > written (e.g., Mob: 0419...) > > There's also the upcoming "cell" processor architecture that may clash >

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ?

2005-04-24 Thread Collins Richey
On 4/24/05, Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > > funnily enough the PHP Guys recommended Apache 1.3 only for a long time. > > I've been using Apache 2 and PHP (CGI due to suEXEC) for more than two > years now on a public webserver. It've never expierenced any > instabilitie

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP 5 unstable ?

2005-04-23 Thread Collins Richey
On 4/23/05, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to bugzilla, there are lots of open bugs (132 to be exact) > containing the word 'php' in the summary. From a quick glimpse many of > them seem related to php-5. > Looks like your're 100% right. One user does not a stable re