Hello,
this is a request for comments on a new project:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/
When the webservers have finished mirroring the xml file, you can view
the description and the goals of the preliminary version of the new
project page for the Gentoo Extreme Security Proje
Kent Fredric schrieb:
...
So you are saying that the person is not the problem but the problem is
the problem.
The person has personally attacked me after i simply concluded that he
should maybe change his attitude to make a better impression on
gentoo-dev and Gentoo developers. This guy i
lol owned :)
Alex
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
.
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:30:13 +0200
Alexander Gabert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And this is why it's a bad idea: it's moving criticism away from
where people will actually read it.
IMHO it is moving criticism away from where people will actua
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:27:44 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PS. this thread is a good example of something that would belong on
gentoo-project. ;)
And this is why it's a bad idea: it's moving criticism away from where
people will actually read it.
Hi :)
Petteri Räty wrote:
> It is my pleasure to announce that Alexander "pappy" Gabert is returning
> from retirement to battle the hardened bugs. Retired sometime in 2004,
> he is now again interested in being blessed with a @gentoo.org email
> address.
>
> Nowadays he lives in Trier, Germany a
hi,
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> > which was
> > intel's horrid first attempt at a 64-bit successor to x86.
Well, sorry, but what you call a "horrid" first attempt is the joined
effort of PARISC developers at HP and X86 developers at Intel, both with
a heritage of over 20 years in CPU design.
I think
