- On 7 Sep, 2017, at 10:53 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wlt...@o-sinc.com
wrote:
>
> In an ideal sense, equipment like this would go to something like OSU
> OSL or some other hosting provider. Though there is the cost of
> bandwidth, power, and man power to service hardware issues. Not to
>
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8 September 2017 at 22:44, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> > Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream
>> > does not cooperate (Bug#630420).
>> > Removal in 30 days
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:33 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500
>> R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>>> Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to
>>> copyright infringement (besides an immediate payout). I
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500
> R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to
>> copyright infringement (besides an immediate payout). In the US they cite
>> the reasoning I gave, from memor
On 09/08/2017 11:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> FYI - if anybody does want to make any comments on the proposed
> devmanual changes to implement the new tags please comment at:
>
> https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org/pull/72
>
> For that matter, if you want to even know what the proposed
DEPENDS part and "binary" function makes me sad panda:
they assumes there are no "vims" exist, while there is at least `vim-qt`
(well, actually that one is dropped from gentoo) and `neovim-qt` (and that one
is in overlays, but anyway), and so on.
I think, it'd be nice to somehow avoid exact bina
This is really messy at the moment because I'm not sure whether the vim
team is interested, and I didn't want to put in the effort if it's just
going to be rejected, but I'm posting what I have here to start some
kind of discussion.
At the moment functions/other things need to be described, among
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:33:11 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Make tc-getBUILD* functions respect host variables (CC & co.) when
> not cross-compiling. This removes the necessity of overriding BUILD_*
> along with the regular variables on the systems that are not concerned
> about cross-compilation, a
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> What do you think about it? Is there anything else that needs being
> covered?
>
FYI - if anybody does want to make any comments on the proposed
devmanual changes to implement the new tags please comment at:
https://github.com/gentoo/devma
On 8 September 2017 at 22:44, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream
> > does not cooperate (Bug#630420).
> > Removal in 30 days.
> >
>
> I don't have any reason to disagree with this but
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream
> does not cooperate (Bug#630420).
> Removal in 30 days.
>
I don't have any reason to disagree with this but I expected a
citation for those things to be in the bug you
Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream
does not cooperate (Bug#630420).
Removal in 30 days.
Upstream no longer maintain (Bug#628908).
Removal in 30 days.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Ciaran McCreesh <
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:10:54 -0500
> Gordon Pettey wrote:
> > And this is all irrelevant since the copyright applies to the
> > software, not the location you obtain it from. Nobody commits
> > copyright in
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:10:54 -0500
Gordon Pettey wrote:
> Distribution licenses are another thing, but if the original SRC_URI from
> the ebuild wasn't RESTICT="fetch", what makes anybody think that would
> suddenly change with a new SRC_URI?
I've seen terms that state people aren't allowed to re
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:10:54 -0500
Gordon Pettey wrote:
> And this is all irrelevant since the copyright applies to the
> software, not the location you obtain it from. Nobody commits
> copyright infringement by buying a used book from their neighbour
> instead of buying it at Half Price Books.
> D
And this is all irrelevant since the copyright applies to the software, not
the location you obtain it from. Nobody commits copyright infringement by
buying a used book from their neighbour instead of buying it at Half Price
Books.
Distribution licenses are another thing, but if the original SRC_UR
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 03:56:38 +1200
Kent Fredric wrote:
> > >> Sir, please see my above comment about building ballistic
> > >> missiles. It may be important for the Gentoo Foundation to add a
> > >> disclaimer similar to the one I mentioned. I would hate for the
> > >> Foundation or any of its admi
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500
R0b0t1 wrote:
> Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to
> copyright infringement (besides an immediate payout). In the US they cite
> the reasoning I gave, from memory.
>
> Maybe that was for trademarks?
This is one of those p
On Friday, September 8, 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> Downloading does not imply committing a felony. As far as anyone can
>> tell it is impossible to prosecute someone for downloading something
>> they already own (regardless of what any EULA has claim
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:01:08 -0400
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> This is more food for thought to start a discussion on new category
> names. With Wayland becoming more of a reality every day. I think some
> of the x11-* categories may need to change. Stuff in there may not be
> bound to X an
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:54:10 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>> It only explains how the functions parse stuff (except for ver_test
>> which uses PMS rules). They are by definition supposed to work with
>> random upstream versions.
> This sounds lik
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> +# A version component can either consist purely of digits ([0-9]+) or
> +# purely of uppercase and lowercase letters ([a-zA-Z]+). Any other
> +# character is treated as a version separator.
Minor documentation nitpick (sorry for not noticing this e
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:54:10 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 12∶48 +, użytkownik Martin Vaeth
> napisał:
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > +# 1.2b-alpha4 -> 1 . 2 '' b - alpha '' 4
> >
> > Is this only to explain the syntax or are there plans to
> > extend the
W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 12∶48 +, użytkownik Martin Vaeth
napisał:
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > +# 1.2b-alpha4 -> 1 . 2 '' b - alpha '' 4
>
> Is this only to explain the syntax or are there plans to
> extend the allowed versions for pms?
>
It only explains how the functions parse st
W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 12∶38 +, użytkownik Chí-Thanh
Christopher Nguyễn napisał:
> commit: 87929d9f6bfe62770cb13547583425e6f2755a59
> Author: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Fri Sep 8 12:38:21 2017 +
> Commit: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ge
Michał Górny wrote:
> +# 1.2b-alpha4 -> 1 . 2 '' b - alpha '' 4
Is this only to explain the syntax or are there plans to
extend the allowed versions for pms?
There is a reason why pms currently does not allow "-" as separators
within versions (with the exception of -r):
With this general synt
EAPI 7 is introducing new version manipulation and comparison functions
that aim to replace versionator.eclass. This eclass provides an 'early
adopter' versions of those routines.
It serves two goals:
a. getting wider review and some real-life testing before
the specification is set in stone, and
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> Quoting from "all-rights-reserved":
>
> | This package has an explicit "all rights reserved" clause, or comes
> | without any license, or only with a disclaimer. This means that you
> | have only the rights that are granted to you by law. I
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 16∶42 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
>> napisał:
>>> Are you saying it is sufficient to just point the SRC_URI at the
>>> new URL and remove the mask? As far as
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Maybe find yourself a lawyer, and ask him. We're all volunteers,
I've already done the research. There is no legal requirement to
contact the authors before changing the SRC_URI.
> and we're no in way obligated to give legal advices to you
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Downloading does not imply committing a felony. As far as anyone can
> tell it is impossible to prosecute someone for downloading something
> they already own (regardless of what any EULA has claimed).
Sure, if the user already has rightfully obtained th
Make tc-getBUILD* functions respect host variables (CC & co.) when
not cross-compiling. This removes the necessity of overriding BUILD_*
along with the regular variables on the systems that are not concerned
about cross-compilation, and does not change the behavior for those
which are.
Closes: htt
33 matches
Mail list logo
