Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Alice Ferrazzi
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2017.06.23 19:54, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > [snip] >> >> As we already contribute to grsec in the past, >> would be sad to see hardened-sources go away. >> What about the possibility of Gentoo forking PaX ? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Alice Ferrazz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2017.06.23 19:54, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: [snip] > > As we already contribute to grsec in the past, > would be sad to see hardened-sources go away. > What about the possibility of Gentoo forking PaX ? > > -- > Thanks, > Alice Ferrazzi > > Gentoo Kernel Project Leader > Mail: Alice Ferrazzi >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:28:27 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > My plan then is as follows. I'll wait one more month and then send out > a news item and later mask hardened-sources for removal. I don't > recommend we remove any of the machinery from Gentoo that deals with PaX > markings. Thank

Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 06/23/2017 09:28 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Since late April, grsecurity upstream has stop making their patches > available publicly. Without going into details, the reason for their > decision revolves around disputes about how their patches were being > (ab)used. > > Si

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Alice Ferrazzi
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Since late April, grsecurity upstream has stop making their patches > available publicly. Without going into details, the reason for their > decision revolves around disputes about how their patches were being > (ab)us

Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
> I welcome feedback. And how about KSPP and other similar projects, that tries to continue the idea of community-friendly development based on latest release available to wide public (or, maybe some other, that was grown in parallel with PaX)? [OFFTOP] I personally very dislike Brad's behav

[gentoo-dev] The status of grsecurity upstream and hardened-sources downstream

2017-06-23 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, Since late April, grsecurity upstream has stop making their patches available publicly. Without going into details, the reason for their decision revolves around disputes about how their patches were being (ab)used. Since the grsecurity patch formed the main core of our hardened-sou

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: ruby21-only packages

2017-06-23 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (23 Jun 2017) # Mask ruby21-only packages for removal in 30 days # Old slots that are ruby21-only dev-ruby/prawn:1 dev-ruby/rspec:0 # ruby21-only package that does not work with current # dev-ruby/parslet versions. dev-ruby/toml # ruby21-only, no maintainer, fails tests www-apps/j