On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Roy Bamford <neddyseag...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 2017.06.23 19:54, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > [snip] >> >> As we already contribute to grsec in the past, >> would be sad to see hardened-sources go away. >> What about the possibility of Gentoo forking PaX ? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Alice Ferrazzi >> >> Gentoo Kernel Project Leader >> Mail: Alice Ferrazzi <ali...@gentoo.org> >> PGP: 2E4E 0856 461C 0585 1336 F496 5621 A6B2 8638 781A >> >> > > Alice, > > Forking with what aim? > Keeping the existing functionality alive in line with kernel > developments or that and adding new features. >
As now we have not enough resource for add new feature, we can maybe consider to keep alive PaX. I heard that also Alpine linux is thinking what to do. Maybe we could ask to merge the efforts. https://forum.alpinelinux.org/forum/pax-grsecurity/future-grsecurity-alpine -- Thanks, Alice Ferrazzi Gentoo Kernel Project Leader Mail: Alice Ferrazzi <ali...@gentoo.org> PGP: 2E4E 0856 461C 0585 1336 F496 5621 A6B2 8638 781A
