[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2017-05-07 23:59 UTC

2017-05-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-07 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-libs/STLport 20170507-07:47 soap 967d0ecf3f1 net-misc/flexget 20170507-16:23 floppym faa11984b8c Additions

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-07 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:53:52 +0200 David Seifert wrote: > This is probably the smaller problem. The link shows a bug where none > of the aforementioned arch teams have keyworded the requested packages > in 4 months. How would the arches.desc proposal fix "dead arch teams"? > Sure, it will make ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-07 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 22:24 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > I'm against. Turning more arches into dev/exp only introduces hidden > depgraph breakages. I think it'd be better if we looked into > the arch.desc proposal and just disabled stable keywords for those > architectures. > This is probably the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-07 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 7. Mai 2017, 22:24:35 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > > > Anyhow, I formally request the Council to vote on dropping these archs > > to unstable/exp profiles for the next Council meeting, explicitly > > overriding any arch concerns that are likely to awake now and going to > > be running a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-07 Thread Michał Górny
On nie, 2017-05-07 at 21:23 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > TL;DR > ia64/ppc/sparc teams are pretty much dead. They have been for a long > time and this won't change any time soon. Gentoo should focus its > resources on archs that are important and has the manpower to support. > Let us please drop th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-07 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 9:23 PM, David Seifert wrote: > TL;DR > ia64/ppc/sparc teams are pretty much dead. They have been for a long > time and this won't change any time soon. Gentoo should focus its > resources on archs that are important and has the manpower to support. > Let us please drop thes

[gentoo-dev] Re: Package up for grabs: net-vpn/libreswan

2017-05-07 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I used to use this package for an IPSec/L2TP VPN to my office, but we > migrated onto Cisco AnyConnect. I now use net-vpn/openconnect > regularly and have not been able to test libreswan since the switch. I also dropped net-dialup/xl2tpd if an

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-vpn/libreswan

2017-05-07 Thread Mike Gilbert
I used to use this package for an IPSec/L2TP VPN to my office, but we migrated onto Cisco AnyConnect. I now use net-vpn/openconnect regularly and have not been able to test libreswan since the switch. libreswan has no open bugs, but there is a pending version bump (3.20).

[gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-07 Thread David Seifert
TL;DR ia64/ppc/sparc teams are pretty much dead. They have been for a long time and this won't change any time soon. Gentoo should focus its resources on archs that are important and has the manpower to support. Let us please drop these 3 archs to dev profiles to ease maintenance. Dear all, I'd li

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/backlite

2017-05-07 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
# Daniel Pielmeier (7 May 2017) # Fails to build with ffmpeg-3. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #575824. app-cdr/backlite 0xC5E80123.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature