Am Sonntag, 7. Mai 2017, 22:24:35 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > > > Anyhow, I formally request the Council to vote on dropping these archs > > to unstable/exp profiles for the next Council meeting, explicitly > > overriding any arch concerns that are likely to awake now and going to > > be running around like headless chicken. > > I'm against. Turning more arches into dev/exp only introduces hidden > depgraph breakages. I think it'd be better if we looked into > the arch.desc proposal and just disabled stable keywords for those > architectures.
That's also what I would prefer (this is exactly what arches.desc is good for). [I'm later going to make some updates over there taking the feedback into account.] -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
