On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:42:43 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> # Andreas K. Hüttel (16 Mar 2017)
> # Replaced by dev-perl/Monitoring-Plugin, bug 575986
> # Removal in 30 days
> dev-perl/Nagios-Plugin
...
# Kent Fredric (18 Feb 2017)
# Renamed upstream to Monitoring::Plugin due to Trademark
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:14:58 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > What do you consider demand ?
>
> > A handful of packages that have to write a hundred lines of
> > boilerplate code to make it work isn't representative of any demand
> > at al
On 16/03/17 23:02, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> While VPNs weren't stylish back when most categories were added to our
> portage tree, they now are hot potatoes. Most VPN-related programs
> currently live in net-misc, which isn't quite right.
>
> If nobody voices reasonable objections
Hey folks,
While VPNs weren't stylish back when most categories were added to our
portage tree, they now are hot potatoes. Most VPN-related programs
currently live in net-misc, which isn't quite right.
If nobody voices reasonable objections, I plan on adding a net-vpn
category soon and moving rel
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:58:55 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On czw, 2017-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:57:44 +0100
> > Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow
# Andreas K. Hüttel (16 Mar 2017)
# Replaced by dev-perl/Monitoring-Plugin, bug 575986
# Removal in 30 days
dev-perl/Nagios-Plugin
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> What do you consider demand ?
> A handful of packages that have to write a hundred lines of
> boilerplate code to make it work isn't representative of any demand
> at all. I've already written in some bug some usecases I foresee for
> even a triv
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 16.03.2017 kell 12:55, kirjutas Joshua Kinard:
> On 03/16/2017 09:49, Michał Górny wrote:
> > //
> > note: i'm in process of testing [building binpkgs] of all glibc
> > versions
> > to confirm i didn't accidentally break anything. - fails in
> > compile
> > phase both befo
On czw, 2017-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:57:44 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow devmanual eclass 101 [1]:
> > > An eclass is a collection of code which
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:57:44 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow devmanual eclass 101 [1]:
> > An eclass is a collection of code which can be used by more than one
> > ebuild.
>
> Which is the case here
On 03/16/2017 09:49, Michał Górny wrote:
> //
> note: i'm in process of testing [building binpkgs] of all glibc versions
> to confirm i didn't accidentally break anything. - fails in compile
> phase both before and after the change.
>
> ---
[snip]
You need to make a catalyst run as well, espe
//
note: i'm in process of testing [building binpkgs] of all glibc versions
to confirm i didn't accidentally break anything. - fails in compile
phase both before and after the change.
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 1404 +++
sys-libs/glibc/files/ebli
Convert the usage of eblits in sys-devel/autoconf into an equivalent
eclass. This makes the ebuilds more readable, more predictable and fixes
compliance with stricter versions of the package manager (i.e. a future
release of Portage).
// changes in v2: fixed phase function call in -
---
eclas
On czw, 2017-03-16 at 13:15 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > +toolchain-autoconf_src_prepare() {
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > + autotools-autoconf_src_prepare
>
> This seems unlikely to work
>
Yes, I admit, - is the only version I didn't test. I'll fix that now
and test it as well.
--
Best re
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow devmanual eclass 101 [1]:
> An eclass is a collection of code which can be used by more than one
> ebuild.
Which is the case here:
sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.13.ebuild| 10 +---
sys-devel/a
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:07:33 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > 100 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
>
> This alone is rather convincing.
Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow devmanual eclass 101 [1]:
An eclass is a collection of code whic
> +toolchain-autoconf_src_prepare() {
[...]
> +
> + autotools-autoconf_src_prepare
This seems unlikely to work
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> 100 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
This alone is rather convincing.
Ulrich
pgpEVcJFAZOur.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Convert the usage of eblits in sys-devel/autoconf into an equivalent
eclass. This makes the ebuilds more readable, more predictable and fixes
compliance with stricter versions of the package manager (i.e. a future
release of Portage).
---
eclass/toolchain-autoconf.eclass | 70 +++
19 matches
Mail list logo
