On czw, 2017-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:57:44 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Alexis Ballier wrote:  
> > > Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow devmanual eclass 101 [1]:
> > > An eclass is a collection of code which can be used by more than one
> > > ebuild.  
> > 
> > Which is the case here:
> > 
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.13.ebuild            | 10 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.59-r7.ebuild         | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.61-r2.ebuild         | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.62-r1.ebuild         | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.63-r1.ebuild         | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.64.ebuild            | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.65-r1.ebuild         | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.67.ebuild            | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.68.ebuild            | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-2.69-r2.ebuild         | 11 +---
> >  sys-devel/autoconf/autoconf-9999.ebuild            | 15 ++---
> 
> 
> You're trying to find loopholes in the wording here, aren't you ? :)
> 
> 
> > > While this eclass might be a good temporary solution, I find it a
> > > rather convincing argument for per-package eclasses :)  
> > 
> > Yes, if there was sufficient demand for such a feature, and it would
> > therefore reduce the number of global eclasses significantly. IMHO it
> > wouldn't be worth it for only a handful of packages.
> 
> 
> What do you consider demand ?
> 
> A handful of packages that have to write a hundred lines of
> boilerplate code to make it work isn't representative of any demand at
> all. I've already written in some bug some usecases I foresee for even
> a trivial 'include'.

I would really appreciate if you stopped diverting this thread. If you
don't have anything to add regarding the patch in question, then please
hesitate from commenting.

If you love eblits that much, then please take appropriate measures to
get them into the next EAPI. Because so far your non-productive comments
 on any effort of cleaning this mess up reach the level of pure
trolling.


-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to