On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:11:20PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Sam Jorna wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:00:51PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >
> >> > OK, can we all decide out of this thread,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Sam Jorna wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:00:51PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> > OK, can we all decide out of this thread, that if any package is
>> > enabling critical functionality via IUSE-defa
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:00:51PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 07/02/17 08:27 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >>
> >> The thread wasn't about discouraging IUSE defaults, rather to decide
> >> when they are appropriate. You cannot omit
Our bug queue has 97 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 9:23:22 AM EST William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:22:22AM +0100, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > I'd recommend to jump a bandwagon and switch to CMake.
> >
> > Yes, it's ugly in certain areas, has its quirks but whoever switches to it
> > ones, never goes ba
On 07/02/17 12:00 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 07/02/17 08:27 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>>
>>> The thread wasn't about discouraging IUSE defaults, rather to decide
>>> when they are appropriate. You cannot omit "pkginternal" from USE_O
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 07/02/17 08:27 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>
>> The thread wasn't about discouraging IUSE defaults, rather to decide
>> when they are appropriate. You cannot omit "pkginternal" from USE_ORDER,
>> because you will break all of the packa
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 07/02/17 08:27 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>
>> The thread wasn't about discouraging IUSE defaults, rather to
>> decide when they are appropriate. You cannot omit "pkginternal"
>> from USE_ORDER, because you will break all of the packages wh
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:22:22AM +0100, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> I'd recommend to jump a bandwagon and switch to CMake.
>
> Yes, it's ugly in certain areas, has its quirks but whoever switches to it
> ones, never goes back, and not because of technical debt being too big.
>
> Also because I c
On 07/02/17 08:27 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> The thread wasn't about discouraging IUSE defaults, rather to decide
> when they are appropriate. You cannot omit "pkginternal" from USE_ORDER,
> because you will break all of the packages whose defaults are either
> critical to the package, or pre
On 02/07/2017 02:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> I see no point in discouraging IUSE defaults, given that they are
> purely advisory for the package manager:
>
> "[...] any use flag name in IUSE may be prefixed by at most one of a
> plus or a minus sign. If such a prefix is present, the package
W dniu 07.02.2017, wto o godzinie 21∶20 +1300, użytkownik Kent Fredric
napisał:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:52:06 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > I see no point in discouraging IUSE defaults, given that they are
> > purely advisory for the package manager:
> >
> > "[...] any use flag name in IUS
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:52:06 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I see no point in discouraging IUSE defaults, given that they are
> purely advisory for the package manager:
>
> "[...] any use flag name in IUSE may be prefixed by at most one of a
> plus or a minus sign. If such a prefix is present, the
13 matches
Mail list logo
