On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 22:02:45 +
"M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> On 06/02/16 22:00, Alex Alexander wrote:
> > Our bug queue has 82 bugs!
> >
> > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
> >
> > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> Only
Hi all,
This is a quick announcement of the early testing of the genkernel-3.5.0.0
release.
The 3.5.0.x series should NOT be considered as stable candidates. As
such, I've also removed ALL keywords from 3.5.0.0.
Further 3.5.0.x releases will land other major changes hopefully, including
updating
On 06/02/16 22:00, Alex Alexander wrote:
> Our bug queue has 82 bugs!
>
> If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
>
> To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
>
> Thanks!
>
Only 82? that's not, like, 4k ... :) http://tinyurl.com/maintainer-wanted .
Our bug queue has 82 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 5 lutego 2016 07:38:44 CET, Jason Zaman
> napisał(a):
>>On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:35:44PM -0600, Gordon Pettey wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Kent Fredric
>><[1]kentfred...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>[ ... ]
Its really sad
On 02/06/2016 10:35 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Automation can go further: if there are multiple maintainers,
> assign bug to the first one and CC others.
Which is exactly what I'm doing in my tinderbox:
# get assignee and cc, GLEP 67 simplifies it
#
m=$(equery --no-color meta -m $curr 2>
Hey,
I spoke with steveeJ the maintainer of app-emulation/rkt and that
package is also without a maintainer. Please, feel free to take
app-emulation/rkt, and if we're still the maintainers in two
weeks, I'll mark it as maintainer-needed.
Short:
app-emulation/rkt will be marked maintainer-nee
On 7 February 2016 at 04:26, William Hubbs wrote:
> One concern I see with making this part of the web ui for Bugzilla is
> that Bugzilla would have to be able to parse the metadata.xml files in
> our portage tree to find the maintainers.
You could simplify it with a cron job that parses metada
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 09:09:13AM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 01/30/2016 06:45 PM, Alex Brandt wrote:
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > I've oft wondered why we don't automatically assign bugs to the
> > ebuild maintainer (if a CPV is in the subject). Would there be an
> > issue with adding a bug modi
On 04/02/16 15:05, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been supporting jack sound server [1] for a long time.
> Currently, we're supporting jack1 as
> media-sound/jack-audio-connection-kit. However, jack2 has been out for
> quite some time.
>
> As its name does not imply, jack2 is not really th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/06/2016 04:43 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Talking about which, I've toyed with asking for bug-assignment
> privileges for awhile, but haven't known who to ask, or if the
> privilege model is fine grained enough to give me that without
> giving me stuff
Patrick Lauer posted on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 09:09:13 +0100 as excerpted:
> Maybe we could add a "Assign to maintainer(s)" button visible only to
> certain groups of users, so that a bugwrangler who decides this bug is
> valid just has to hit one button instead of figuring out the details of
> assignm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/05/2016 03:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Kent Fredric
> wrote:
>> On 6 February 2016 at 07:19, Rich Freeman
>> wrote:
>>> 'd be all for automated bug assignment. Usually when this
>>> comes up a bunch of hero b
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:10:48 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 03:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > The main problem I see with auto-assignment is that some asignees end
> > up being black holes for bugs. If two active devs get their bugs
> > crossed it isn't a big deal since they'll just
On 01/30/2016 06:45 PM, Alex Brandt wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I've oft wondered why we don't automatically assign bugs to the
> ebuild maintainer (if a CPV is in the subject). Would there be an
> issue with adding a bug modification hook to bugzilla or a daily
> job to re-assign bugs to ebuild own
15 matches
Mail list logo
