On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:54:01PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote
> Please make this optional. Elog already contains too much information
> and it is already hard to read logs after world update or other
> massive change. It literally takes hours sometimes.
Agreed 100%. I filed a successfull bu
On 2016-01-23 09:48, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 07:26 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> > In regards to:
> > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f
> >
> > I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also
> > considering adding a ne
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:51:51PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote
> On 01/21/2016 05:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should start a "gentoo-ebuilds" mailing list to help regular
> > users learn the ins and outs of making ebuilds.
>
> Try gentoo-devhelp@lists.g.o, or the asso
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:04:56 +0800 Ian Delaney wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500
> Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
>
> > Duncan:
> > > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > That gave me the idea of a maintainer-needed eclass. When p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hey all,
sorry for hijacking this thread, but it's kinda relevant...
Since stabilizing Apache 2.4 (and Perl 5.22) is on the table- we would really
like to still have a functioning mod_perl in the future.
Please please please, test www-apache/m
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>
>
> I would like some feedback on the documentation/comments in the
> eclass. I'm certain it could be improved. Though, if you were able to
> follow them (not a slight, just you were the first to follow them), I
> might have done good en
Hey,
I've recently stopped using the following packages and would like
them to find a better home. Feel free to take them if they're
something that interests you.
* app-admin/fleet
* app-backup/rdiff-backup
I'll mark these as maintainer-wanted if no one has claimed them in
14 days.
Regards,
On 01/23/2016 07:26 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> In regards to:
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f
>
> I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also
> considering adding a new USE_EXPAND as well that would control the
> specific sl
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500
Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> Duncan:
> > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > That gave me the idea of a maintainer-needed eclass. When packages
> > are set to maintainer-needed, they can simply inherit this e
This came up in bug 572348. Question, especially to maintainers of
eselect modules, is it safe to globally set "umask +rx" in eselect,
or are there any circumstances where files should be created with more
restrictive permissions when root's umask asks for it?
Of course, it would still be possible
In regards to:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f
I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also
considering adding a new USE_EXPAND as well that would control the
specific slots the user would like to build PostgreSQL-related
extensio
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Patrice Clement wrote:
>
> , I quite like your idea but what about
> first?
I don't see any strict dependency on these two ideas. By all means
both of you should feel free to get them implemented.
If we only implemented ideas when all the other "more important
Tuesday 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49, NP-Hardass wrote :
> With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I
> started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition
> finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I was
> wondering what the community thinks ab
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:51:51 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 05:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should start a "gentoo-ebuilds" mailing list to help
> > regular users learn the ins and outs of making ebuilds.
>
> Try gentoo-devhelp@lists.g.o, or the associ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:30:14 -0800
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 01/21/2016 02:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:45:20PM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote
> [...]
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
